SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sunny Jim who wrote (91947)12/23/2008 11:14:47 PM
From: mishedlo5 Recommendations  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 116555
 
LA Times picked up my auto story big time
latimesblogs.latimes.com
Mish



To: Sunny Jim who wrote (91947)12/24/2008 9:04:42 AM
From: studdog  Respond to of 116555
 
SunnyJim
I agree with your analysis, especially the part about population and resources. We are already maximally exploiting our finite resources such that depletion is occurring all over the world. Whether you look at mineral wealth, topsoil, fisheries, standing timber, wildlife resources, arable land, freshwater, fresh air, etc., we are using it up. And this is with only a fraction of the world's population living a "western" lifestyle. If we want to preserve any semblance of our current standard of living either the rest of the world will have to continue paying for it or we will have to see a reduction in population, so that population:resource ratios can become sustainable. It does appear that our world leaders are just going to prop up an unsustainable system and not address the real issues. Is there anywhere a serious discussion about population? That is the real issue that will determine our standards of living and no one seems to want to tackle it. Malthus was right.