Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The DD Maven -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shortsinthesand who wrote (507)	12/24/2008 7:01:27 AM
From: rrufff	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 736

Hi Shorts - You started this conversation by claiming that I brutally attacked you. So far, this is what you have come up: 3 things - I'll respond to each 1.This is the only post of MINE that you cited so far LOL - I'm still waiting. "Waiting for Godot." You too - have a great weekend and be well. Shorts - for someone who goes around being critical of others, this is what you call a "brutal attack?" I said I was still waiting and laughing. Seriously, shorts, maybe you didn't get the joke and aren't familiar with the term "Waiting for Godot," but I can't imagine anyone seriously thinking that this was a "brutal attack." Perhaps you wish to re-think this one. I'll be waiting (for Godot, LOL). 2. You cited ANOTHER PERSON posting to me as MY attack?? I can't control what others post. I follow a lot of boards. I don't always respond. I posted, and you cited my post, where I stated I knew very little about the stock and really was WAITING for information, both positive and negative. I got a response from both of you. I never put a lot of effort into the stock as I only had shares from a related company and then sold those. Do you seriously think I have to respond to every post? I follow about 200 stocks. As it is, I rarely sleep. I lost interest in JPHC and felt no need to continue even reading. Unlike others, I don't make a career of spamming over and over after I lose interest and have nothing of substance to add to the discussion. How can any reasonable person suggest that my non-response was a "brutal attack?" Please note that I have posted previously here to you a couple of times whereby you agreed with a cowardly poster who really did defame me and misrepresented my posts. You did more than agree in silence. You agreed in a post. Yet, despite the lack of any substance in the posts, in either yours or the cowardly hit and run poster's, I got no apology. 3. I did not respond to a post of yours. The post said that the PR's were false and misleading. Again, how could any reasonable person think that a non-response was a "brutal attack?" I can't remember if that is why I sold my shares or not, but, in any event I did. I didn't respond that I agreed with you or that I disagreed with you. I probably did not have any independent verification and felt it was best to defer to both you and survivor, both of whom were posting that this was a scam. Unlike others, I don't feel the need to post when I have little of substance to add and am already pressed for free time. I suppose I could have posted, "yes, I agree," or "no, I don't agree." But, again, I don't think I owe anyone that, it's a waste of electrons, and clearly, it is no "brutal attack." Shorts, again, I'll suggest to you that in the spirit of this holy season, perhaps you should take a deep breath, evaluate your own posts as you do others, be less personally involved, and think out clearly before you post what amounts to a false statement. To date, I see no "brutal attack" originating from me. I suspect almost any other objective reader would agree. Have a nice holiday. :-)