Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The DD Maven -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shortsinthesand who wrote (522)	12/24/2008 9:34:48 AM
From: rrufff	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 736

Again, shorts, I guess there is a language issue here. I'm not sure what this means, "every time you say I didn't give a 'substantiate' [sic] evidence the stock is a Scam." I'm just guessing now, but I think you are saying that even though your posts were not substantive, the stock turned out to be a scam, and somehow you are taking credit for that. You finish off by saying you were right and I was somehow wrong. Again, you haven't provided a specific post where I said you were wrong, let alone, even one iota of evidence that I brutally attacked you. Yes, I "brutally attack" posts that are non-substantive, but typically, that is to get substantive information. I learn much from negative posters and often make decisions on that basis. If a substantive post convinces me to sell, I do. I think I did that with your JPHC. If a negative post is moronic or vacuous, is there anything wrong with pointing that out? I've often posted that I just ignore the ridiculous one-line positive posts, but I do pay attention to negative posts, primarily to make sure that I haven't missed anything. So, as to who was right and who was wrong, I don't see a specific post to discuss. Unlike you, I am not claiming to be right all the time. I'll leave that to you, Mr. Infallible. :-)