SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (442449)12/24/2008 12:56:35 PM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576807
 
"Because I'm not f*cking stupid."

That is not evident from your posts on the matter.

It looks like your basic assumption is that only if the salinity in the whole Sound is changed would it make a difference. But, that isn't the case at all. Even if the Sound gets thoroughly flushed every tidal cycle or so, and it is far from clear that is even close to happening, it is still possible to affect near shore. Depending on exactly what percentage of the water gets flushed on each tidal cycle, it could certainly accumulate significant salt in the Sound itself.



To: i-node who wrote (442449)12/24/2008 2:15:34 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576807
 
>>> You know this, how?

Because I'm not f*cking stupid.

You're beyond stupid. You are someone who lets his ideology pervert and undermine his intelligence. That makes you very stupid!


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News