Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (442705)	12/26/2008 10:32:38 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575797

Because, as we know, truthiness overrides anything. It should be obvious that reasoning with little data and flawed It should be obvious to anyone, without the need to measure or analyze a damned thing, that salting the roads a few times in Seattle each year isn't going to affect a damned thing in Puget Sound. I'm sorry, but anyone who would suggest such a thing is being obstinate without cause. This is why people are ridiculing the decision. If you are so dead set on applying scientific analysis to a situation which, intuitively, one can see it is unnecessary and useless, that's fair enough. Please provide the evidence that salting the roads in Seattle in the past has, in any way, adversely affected the Sound. That should be simple enough. These idiots in Seattle are risking the property and lives of their residents to protect the Sound from a spec of salt. Where is the evidence this is a good decision that is warranted by science?