Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tecate78732 who wrote (257602)	12/27/2008 6:55:58 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

The way I see it, Intel's public story was IA-64 was to be the next generation. I don't blame them for trying to create a proprietary processor, just part of the business cycle. The problem is,as I have mentioned in the past, if what you say is true, then you have divulged privileged inside information no one in the public had access to. It's why the company I work for says since I represent the company I work for, I am not to say anything about the company I work for or any of its competitors. You can say "well, the comments are my own and do not represent the company I work for", but once it makes it in a press story that an Intel employee said something on a blog contrary to Intel's public corporate position, then the can of worms has been opened. With the numbers of Intel related posters I have encountered on message boards, the answer seems to be Intel promotes trashing their competitors. Just wonder who takes the fall if it hits the fan?