SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dan3 who wrote (257627)12/28/2008 12:14:09 PM
From: tecate78732Respond to of 275872
 
Intel scheduled the release of Tejas in second quart of 2005.

xbitlabs.com
mikeshardware.co.uk

There is roadmap heaven at Mike's hardware. Intel roadmaps always had x86 mpus on them. And no it was not embedded systems, Intel stated and I posted a pointer to the fact that Intel said they would develop x86 mpus as long as their customers wanted them, and to the best of my knowledge, their customers have not ever moved to Itanium family and have kept the x86 development chain grooving.. Intel did have the make their famous 'right hand turn'

video.intel.com

informationweek.com

right hand turn, started in Otellini has championed Intel's move to dual-core CPUs, famously hailing it as a "hard right-hand turn" in the company's processor roadmap, when he announced Intel's plan to move toward the technology in May 2004. He's ramped the effort up to full bore in less than a year. This April, Otellini pegged the total number of dual-core efforts currently underway at Intel at 17. Two dual-core desktop Pentium processors have already begun shipping. Fifteen other processors, encompassing a mix of desktop, server, and mobile CPUs, are on the way

Intel would not have done the right hand turn in 04 if their goal was to exit the x86 business on desktop, mobile and server.



To: Dan3 who wrote (257627)12/28/2008 1:03:03 PM
From: rzborusaRespond to of 275872
 
Dan,

Maybe there was a time when "looking way down the road" ..., but you only have to read corporate boiler plate Disclaimer to find, "forward looking statements ...". So, maybe its unfair to hold feet to a fire of, ~ a lack of negative proof metric.