Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (174064)	12/28/2008 4:17:40 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

their carbon footprint is ginormous as well....tax is being considered for farting and belching cows: greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (174064)	12/28/2008 4:39:36 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 306849

the problem is that half of the worlds squirrels have moved to a 2-block radius around my house.

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (174064)	12/28/2008 5:22:21 PM
From: coug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

I am not writing or thinking about what the human mammal eats, only the masses or numbers of the human mammal, and their associated "tools", autos, houses, heat etc.and how greatly these impact the environment.. I do not believe other mammals have these to a great extent, although I did read some monkeys use sticks to reach things..:) Also, I have to believe if there were less humans, there would a corresponding reduction in the bovine population.. They are basically just serve as a very inefficient "protein machine"..