SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (174086)12/28/2008 5:58:47 PM
From: Lizzie TudorRespond to of 306849
 
Yeah, after all:
"CO2- they call it pollution, we call it LIFE".

youtube.com

They Call It Pollution. We Call It Life.

by JJ Sutherland

A scene from one of the new ads promoting carbon dioxide from

NPR.org, May 23, 2006 · The Competitive Enterprise Institute, which gets some of its funding from such companies as ExxonMobil, has released a counterstrike to Al Gore's new documentary An Inconvenient Truth. While I haven't seen the film, from the press it's getting, it's a jeremiad against global warming.

CEI takes issue with that and has released two TV ads, that -- get this -- promote CO2. Now, a vast majority of scientists agree that man-made pollutants, especially CO2, are definitely causing an increase in the Earth's temperature. How fast and how much is open to debate, but pretty much everyone agrees, this is probably not a good thing.

CEI's ads sound like something that Saturday Night Live (which Gore recently hosted) might come up with. Their tag line about CO2, "They call it pollution. We call it life."

There are some things you just can't make up.



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (174086)12/28/2008 6:43:08 PM
From: cougRespond to of 306849
 
My point, carbon in itself is harmless but combined with oxygen through excessive mammallian activity (mostly humans imo) added to other sources has far reaching effects, not so benign..

I want to correct myself on a previous post, I used the word "correspondingly".. That's not right as much of planet's people do not eat beef..

PS: I KNOW plants love CO2.. That's why I called them sinks for CO2..

I know too how coal was formed..:)

PS again: re:>>And methane has a relatively short lifespan and as it breaks down, it does form more CO2.<<

That's right and what is CO2?.. :)

PS, one last time: I have to move on now, Thanks for the conversation.. I'm just that way..:)



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (174086)12/29/2008 9:04:11 AM
From: Reilly DiefenbachRespond to of 306849
 
Questions:

1. How many domesticated cows do we have now in the North America?
2. How many wild bison were on the continent when Europeans first arrived?
3. Is there much difference in methane content between domestic bovine flatulence versus bison flatulence?