Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kirk © who wrote (41763)	12/29/2008 1:29:07 PM
From: Midwest_Investor	5 Recommendations Respond to of 42834

>>>So I take it you refuse to answer the questions I asked? I find it strange that Kirk is complaining about someone else not answering questions. If one looks back into recent history, one will find that it is Kirk who very often doesn't answer questions which are presented to him. BTW, It will be interesting in a few short weeks to see how Kirk did in 2008, broken out into "Explore" and "total portfolio" returns/results. These numbers will speak louder than words.

To: Kirk © who wrote (41763)	12/29/2008 8:06:32 PM
From: octavian	3 Recommendations Respond to of 42834

kirk said to gronieel: <<So I take it you refuse to answer the questions I asked? Message 25283409 What a loser you are! Message 25283459; --Don't those guys who won't answer questions piss you off, kirk? That BFree guy did the same thing to me. He came in here, making all these accusations against us non-bashers and objective people. And then, when I re-asked some questions to him (plus a few new ones) in post 41747, he conveniently disappeared from the board. "Never answer a question that might harm the agenda," is the bashers' motto. What they don't understand is that not answering can also "harm the agenda."