Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pompsander who wrote (3984)	12/29/2008 2:40:55 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	1 Recommendation Respond to of 103300

Re: "The handling of the Lehman failure was a terrible event..." Hindsight is always wonderful. But, at the time, the policy debate (intervene or don't intervene) was fairly evenly balanced within the halls of power... and the truth is that NO ONE really knew what the result of either policy would be. (And, I'll admit, I was personally in the camp of "Hell no! Don't rescue them with public money!" :-) With a policy debate so finely balanced, ample hypotheticals to support each side, only trial and error could produce a useful answer. (For the record: I believe that it was the government FAILURE to properly regulate the industry, which failure to have proper and appropriate risk-reduction rules in-force CREATED the problem of over-levered financial institutions and too much systemic risk, that moved us to the situation where we only had a menu of bad choices to select from. NONE of which, at that late date, were entirely 'right' or without great harm.) The truly important question that needs to be asked is NOT 'should the government, at that late date, stepped in to rescue Lehman or not?' Rather, the best question to ask is '*what went wrong in the decade or two previous* to the Lehman failure point which GREW our financial system into such a shaky and perilous mess of interlinked risks?**'