Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (30951)	1/5/2009 8:23:15 AM
From: Peter Dierks	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

"As I previously wrote the SCOTUS responds to public opinion. If you want to list some of the terrible rulings please add Roe v. Wade. The SCOTUS appears unwilling to address the facts that lead a reasonable person to believe that Obama is most likely an illegal immigrant who should be deported. As I stated before they most likely wish to avoid ruling in such a toxic issue. Since the fMSM have avoided educating those Americans who don't care if they are informed about the gravity of Obama's apparent illegitimacy, a ruling would have come as a shock to the uninformed. The feeling of rejection from those uninformed people would likely well up into riots that would make the LA riots seem mild. Of course the liberally biased media would take the course necessary to force the hand of the SCOTUS to ensure the most liberal President since Carter." Most courts will respond to strong and sustained public opinion --- if it is strong enough, and sustained over a long enough period of time. That is why the Legislative branch is generally a much better option when it comes to changing laws so as to respond to the public's desires. You seem desirous of changing the subject. Or perhaps you can explain what you want the legislature to do (prior to January 20th) to address Obama's illegality.