SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: altair19 who wrote (157212)1/1/2009 7:46:47 PM
From: SiouxPal2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362398
 
This is neato....Yoshimoto Cube

viralvideochart.com



To: altair19 who wrote (157212)1/3/2009 12:15:17 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362398
 
U.S. Stocks Advance, S&P 500 Jumps to 2-Month High; GM Rallies

By Elizabeth Stanton

Jan. 2 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. stocks climbed to a two-month high, following the market’s worst annual drop since the Great Depression, as General Motors Corp. got its first cash infusion from the government and rising oil prices lifted energy shares.

GM, the largest U.S. automaker, rallied 14 percent after receiving $4 billion in rescue loans from the Treasury to help the company avoid collapse. Exxon Mobil Corp. and Chevron Corp. led a gauge of energy producers to a sixth straight advance. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. jumped 16 percent on takeover speculation after agreeing to notify one of its largest investors of any offers.

“Wall Street is starting a new year, and there’s always more money at the beginning of the year,” said James Swanson, chief investment strategist at Boston-based MFS Investment Management, which oversees $160 billion. “The markets will see beyond the current bad economic data and begin a broad-based move upward in the next three or four months.”

The S&P 500 rose 3.2 percent to 931.8, capping its first three-day gain in five weeks and best start to a year since 2003. The Dow Jones Industrial Average increased 258.3 points, or 2.9 percent, to 9,034.69. The Russell 2000 Index of small U.S. companies advanced 1.3 percent.

Both the S&P 500 and Dow climbed to their highest closes since the first week of November. About 7.2 billion shares changed hands on all U.S. exchanges, 29 percent fewer than the three-month daily average as trading slowed at the end of the holiday-shortened week.

Stocks in Europe and Asia rose today, trimming losses from last year’s record slump in the MSCI World Index, as investors speculated governments will step up efforts to revive the global economy.

‘Worst Has Been Seen’

The S&P 500 decreased 38.5 percent in 2008, the most since the 38.6 percent plunge in 1937, and sank to an 11-year low on Nov. 20. Volatility increased, with the index rising or falling at least 5 percent in a single day 18 times during the year

“The worst has been seen,” Jeffrey Saut, chief investment strategist at Raymond James & Associates in St. Petersburg, Florida, told Bloomberg Television. The firm manages $190 billion. “I’m not looking for a super year in 2009; I think we’ll do better” than in 2008.

The S&P 500 climbed 6.8 percent this week, its best week since November, and extended its rebound from Nov. 20 to 24 percent. Stocks rallied last month as the government rescued Citigroup, President-elect Barack Obama pledged to stimulate growth with spending on infrastructure and the Federal Reserve cut interest rates to as low as zero percent to combat the worst financial crisis in seven decades.

Energy Advance

Exxon Mobil, the world’s largest oil company, rose 2.3 percent to $81.64. Chevron, the second-biggest U.S. energy company, added 3.5 percent to $76.52. Crude jumped 3.9 percent to $46.34 a barrel, capping the biggest weekly gain since 1986, as retaliatory attacks by Israel against Hamas in the Gaza strip threatened to disrupt supplies from the Middle East. Natural gas climbed 6.2 percent as lower-than-normal temperatures were forecast for the U.S. East Coast in early January.

“The stocks are very attractively priced,” Robert Schaeffer, a money manager at Becker Capital Management Inc., said of energy companies. “The long-term supply-demand case for oil is very bullish.” Becker Capital oversees $1.6 billion in Portland, Oregon.

GM surged 45 cents to $3.65 for the biggest gain in the Dow average. The loans are part of $17.4 billion in financing that the Treasury has promised to GM and Chrysler LLC in a bid to avert a bankruptcy by either company. GM’s infusion will help the Detroit-based automaker pay suppliers as its cash dwindles.

Hotel Rally

Starwood added $2.90 to $20.80. The third-largest U.S. lodging company entered into a confidentiality agreement to give Equity Group Investments LLC the opportunity to top any third- party takeover bid, Starwood said in a regulatory filing.

Wyndham Worldwide Corp., the franchiser of Ramada and Super 8 hotels, advanced 15 percent to $7.56.

Citigroup Inc. climbed 43 cents, or 6.4 percent, to $7.14. Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit and Chairman Win Bischoff will forgo 2008 bonuses after the bank lost three-quarters of its market value in the year and got a $45 billion U.S. bailout, Pandit said on Dec. 31 in a memo to employees.

Stocks climbed even after a report showed manufacturing in the U.S. shrank in December at the fastest pace in almost three decades as the recession deepened. The Institute for Supply Management’s factory index fell to 32.2, less than forecast and the lowest level since 1980. Readings less than 50 indicate contraction. The group’s price measure fell to the lowest level in almost six decades.

‘Priced In’

“A lot of the bad news is priced in,” said Matthew DiFilippo, director of research at Indiana, Pennsylvania-based Stewart Capital Advisors LLC, which manages $1 billion. “From an economic perspective, we don’t expect good news for some time. In the long run the economy’s going to turn and earnings are going to improve.”

Dynegy Inc. rose the most in the S&P 500, gaining 19 percent to $2.38. The owner of power plants in 11 U.S. states agreed to dissolve its development venture with LS Power Associates LP, partly because of the credit crisis.

Oshkosh Corp. climbed 16 percent to $10.30. The Wisconsin- based maker of military trucks won a contract valued at as much as $1.12 billion to provide support services for heavy- and medium-duty trucks used by the U.S. government.

Shippers Gain

DryShips Inc. and Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd., whose vessels transport commodities, gained as rates to charter Capesize-class ships rose and China completed plans to support its steel and auto industries. Dryships rose 17 percent to $12.49. Genco added 15 percent to $17.01.

Europe’s Dow Jones Stoxx 600 Index climbed 3.1 percent today, while the MSCI Asia Pacific excluding Japan Index increased for a fifth day. South Korea’s president pledged to counter the economic slowdown, while India’s central bank cut interest rates for the fourth time in less than three months, extending the steepest set of reductions since 2000.

At its lowest closing level of 2008 on Nov. 20, the S&P 500 was down 49 percent for the year and 52 percent from its Oct. 9, 2007, record of 1,565.15. The plunge came as more than $1 trillion in credit-related losses at global financial companies triggered the first simultaneous recessions in the U.S., Europe and Japan since World War II.

Beer and Cigarettes

Brewers and tobacco companies boosted by takeovers as well as discount retailers were about the only winners in 2008.

Anheuser-Busch Cos. jumped 31 percent after InBev NV agreed to acquire the owner of Budweiser beer to create the world’s biggest brewer. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the biggest retailer, and restaurant operator McDonald’s Corp. were the only two companies in the 30-stock Dow average that rose last year.

Corporate profits have fallen seven straight quarters, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Should earnings fall through the first half of 2009, as analysts surveyed by Bloomberg project, it would be the longest streak of declines since the government began tracking quarterly data in 1947.

The Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index, known as Wall Street’s fear gauge, posted a 78 percent gain to 40 in 2008. Its close of 80.86 on Nov. 20 was the highest in its 19- year history. The so-called VIX, a measure of how much investors are paying for insurance from stock declines in the options market, had never exceeded 50 before October. It slid 2 percent to 39.19 today.

The 10-day average S&P 500 swing between intraday high and low has narrowed to 2.43 percent, down by almost three-quarters from a peak of 9.02 on Oct. 16. The benchmark moved in a 3.92 percent range today, down from a 6.62 percent average in October. Options derive their value in part from the historic volatility of the underlying index or security.

To contact the reporters on this story: Elizabeth Stanton in New York at estanton@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: January 2, 2009 16:50 EST



To: altair19 who wrote (157212)1/3/2009 10:42:17 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362398
 
Madoff Exposed Investors' Weak Spots
_______________________________________________________________

By Michael S. Rosenwald
Columnist
The Washington Post
Sunday, January 4, 2009

One of the many mysteries of Bernie Madoff's alleged $50 billion Ponzi scheme is why so many people broke a cardinal rule of investing by over-allocating money in one position. Many investors -- charities, individual investors, even well-known fund managers -- have lost everything, right down to their last penny.

How could so many smart people do something that, in hindsight, seems so dim-witted? The answer is simple. No matter how accomplished, experienced or savvy, people succumb to age-old human behaviors -- and failings -- when making investment decisions.

"You cannot go get a glass of water if you have no feelings or emotions," said Denise Shull, a New York consultant who coaches investors and traders about how people make decisions.

"We walk around with the idea that we are logical when it comes to these decisions, but our brains are designed to use feelings and emotions as a short cut."

In over-allocating money to one position, investors are typically prone to several short cuts that get them in trouble. One primary mistake is uniquely intertwined with Madoff's alleged scheme -- the allure of consistent small gains. A chart of Madoff's purported returns shows a line going steadily up, month after month, 1 or 2 percent. Those kinds of gains are intoxicating. Richard Peterson, a psychiatrist who co-founded MarketPsych, a Los Angeles psychological and financial consulting group, said we actually fall in love with them.

"It's like a slot machine that pays you a little each time," he said. "Over time you kind of fall in love with that machine. You'll actually have the hormones and strong attachment and bonding. You trust it. You want more satisfaction from these gains."

Peterson pointed to a famous study in Taiwan showing that gamblers chose a strategy paying them repeated small amounts even if at some point they had to take a huge loss. In more than 200 trials, the gamblers were given different decks to select cards from. In one deck, on average four of the five cards produced small gains, while the fifth card wiped out the wins and led them down a money losing path. The other decks of cards produced, on average, four small losses and one big win, which netted out to overall gains. The researchers were stunned when, given a choice, gamblers continued to want to pull cards from the small-gain deck.

"We like these consistent gains," Peterson said. "You can't underestimate their power."

Timothy Maurer, a financial planner in Hunt Valley, Md., knows exactly what Peterson is talking about. He has a retired client with more than half her money tied up in a mutual fund that has consistently given her the exact amount of income she needs to live. "She has grown to rely on this thing," Maurer said. "It gives her comfort. But at some point, the exact opposite might be the case." By that, he means the investment could turn sour and really wreck his client's income -- and comfort.

The Madoff trap also exposed a persistent problem among all investors: the failure to do timely rebalancing of their portfolios. A remarkable AllianceBernstein survey of 1,000 investors showed that nearly 40 percent of investors without an adviser did not have an approach for allocating and rebalancing investments. Some 55 percent of those people reported that they never got around to doing it.

Most startling: 70 percent of investors, including those with an adviser, said they are prone to change their hairstyle more frequently than they rebalance their portfolio.

Investors -- especially those who got tricked by Madoff -- can become prey to their own trusting nature. Many investors were led to Madoff by similar connections in Jewish social and philanthropic circles. It's called affinity investing -- investors let their guard down and are liable to break investment rules when they are led to the water by someone they trust.

"If we trust somebody, not only do we trust them to take care of our kids or to go to dinner with them, but we trust our own decision-making to them," Peterson said. "If they decide to invest in something, we think they have done the due diligence. Or that they're smart, they know what they are doing."

Familiarity comforts and lulls us into thinking we are doing well. Studies show that individual investors and even mutual fund managers tend to invest more in companies located near them. What's really remarkable is that the comfort they derive from being near an investment -- perhaps thinking they will know more about the firm -- does not translate into bigger gains. In a paper called "The Local Bias of Individual Investors," Ning Zhu, a professor at the University of California at Davis, found that "investors tend to invest in companies with which they are familiar even though such familiarity is not particularly helpful to their equity investment."

But familiarity, especially when it comes to getting tips from friends, can breed a strange sort of competition. Shull, the New York investment coach, said that investors fear losing money and missing out on the investment that could be The One. "It's the fear of being inferior, fearing the other guy is going to do better," she said.

So, ignoring common investment wisdom, we commit more than we should to a "winner" like Madoff and sweep in our gains without doing our due diligence. And as our winner fattens our portfolio, we stick with him, falling in love rather than redistributing the gains for possibly better returns and our own protection.



To: altair19 who wrote (157212)1/3/2009 11:38:56 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362398
 
G.M.’s Secret Success
_______________________________________________________________

By WILLIAM J. HOLSTEIN
Op-Ed Contributor
The New York Times
January 3, 2009

With billions of federal dollars flowing to General Motors, and with the incoming administration likely to discover that still more assistance is required, we can expect renewed calls for G.M.’s chief executive, Rick Wagoner, to lose his job as the price of failure. This view presupposes that Mr. Wagoner has not been willing to bring G.M. into line with the new global reality, that he has not designed cars Americans want to buy and that the company is a “dinosaur,” to quote Senator Richard C. Shelby, Republican of Alabama.

In reality, Mr. Wagoner has presided over the most sweeping transformation of G.M. since the 1920s. He has reversed management’s long practice of meekly going along with the demands of the United Auto Workers, notably with a deal to transfer health care costs to a union-controlled trust over the next two years.

During his tenure, as president, then as chief executive, Mr. Wagoner also put in place a previously unthinkable two-tier wage system to reduce the company’s average cost per worker; halved the company’s unionized work force in the United States through layoffs and plant closures; spun off Delphi Corporation, its largest parts supplier; and sold controlling interest of GMAC, its financing arm.

A decade ago, suggesting that Mr. Wagoner attempt these restructuring goals would have been ridiculed as unrealistic. But these moves have largely succeeded and by 2010 should strip $5,000 from the cost of every G.M. vehicle.

The company has made enormous strides in imitating and improving upon Toyota’s lean manufacturing system. At G.M. plants, gone are the mass assembly techniques pioneered by Henry Ford. Instead, workers are organized in small Japanese-style teams and encouraged to make sure problems are fixed on the spot rather than passed down the line. The quality gap between G.M. and Toyota has been closed.

Mr. Wagoner has allowed his designers to recapture car design leadership with products like the Cadillac CTS, the Saturn Aura, the new Chevrolet Malibu and the revived and visually dazzling Camaro. The cliché that G.M. makes only gas-guzzling sport utility vehicles is years out of date.

On the innovation front, Mr. Wagoner was responsible for introducing OnStar, the onboard communications and navigation system, and he has made a huge commitment to lithium-ion batteries, which will power the Chevrolet Volt, an extended-range electric vehicle. If the Obama administration wants to create new “green” industries here in the United States, these batteries represent a potential $150-billion-a-year opportunity.

Lastly, Mr. Wagoner has globalized G.M. to a degree that it never has been before. The company’s strong position in China has helped support the difficult turnaround effort in North America.

Before the financial crisis tanked American automotive sales, Mr. Wagoner had almost guided the country’s largest industrial company into a new era, demonstrating great resilience in the face of intense global competition. Making him a scapegoat might be politically expedient but it ignores the very tangible progress he has achieved.

*William J. Holstein is the author of the forthcoming “Why G.M. Matters: Inside the Race to Transform an American Icon.”

Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company