SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rock_nj who wrote (157213)1/1/2009 11:32:47 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362297
 
A conversation with Drew Westen author of "The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding The Fate of The Nation"

charlierose.com



To: Rock_nj who wrote (157213)1/3/2009 4:19:17 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362297
 
Some Forecasters See a Fast Economic Recovery
______________________________________________________________

By LOUIS UCHITELLE
The New York Times
January 3, 2009

Economics as the dismal science? Not in some quarters.

In the midst of the deepest recession in the experience of most Americans, many professional forecasters are optimistically heading into the new year declaring that the worst may soon be over.

For this rosy picture to play out, they are counting on the Obama administration and Congress to come through with a substantial stimulus package, at least $675 billion over two years.

They say that will get the economy moving again in the face of persistently weak spending by consumers and businesses, not to mention banks that are reluctant to extend credit.

If the dominoes fall the right way, the economy should bottom out and start growing again in small steps by July, according to the December survey of 50 professional forecasters by Blue Chip Economic Indicators. Investors seemed to be in a similarly optimistic mood on Friday, bidding up stocks by about 3 percent.

But in the absence of that government stimulus, the grim economic headlines of 2008 will probably continue for some time, these forecasters acknowledge.

“Without this federal largess, the consensus forecast for 2009 is for the recession to continue through most of the year,” said Randell E. Moore, executive editor of Blue Chip Economic Indicators, which conducts the monthly survey of forecasters.

Many economists are more pessimistic, of course. Nouriel Roubini at New York University, who called the 2008 market disaster correctly, wrote in a recent commentary on Bloomberg News that he foresees “a deep and protracted contraction lasting at least through the end of 2009.”

Even in 2010, he added, the recovery may be so weak “that it will feel terrible even if the recession is technically over.”

But Mr. Roubini is not among the economists surveyed by Blue Chip Economic Indicators. These professional forecasters are typically employed by investment banks, trade associations and big corporations.

They base their forecasts on computer models that tend to see the American economy as basically sound, even in the worst of times. That makes these forecasters generally a more optimistic lot than the likes of Mr. Roubini.

Their credibility suffered for it last year. They did not see a recession until late summer. One reason they were blindsided: their computer models do not easily account for emotional factors like the shock from the credit crisis and falling housing prices that have so hindered borrowing and spending.

Those models also take as a given that the natural state of a market economy like America’s is a high level of economic activity, and that it will rebound almost reflexively to that high level from a recession.

But that assumes that banks and other lenders are not holding back on loans, as they are today, depriving the nation of the credit necessary for a vigorous economy.

“Most of our models are structured in a way that the economy is self-righting,” said Nigel Gault, chief domestic economist for IHS Global Insight, a consulting and forecasting firm in Lexington, Mass.

Even if the economy begins to right itself by this summer, the recession would still be the longest since the 1930s, which was the last time the government engaged in widespread public spending to overcome the persistent inertia in consumer and business spending.

“The consensus says we are in the deepest part of the recession now,” Mr. Moore said. “But the stimulus package and much lower gasoline prices are expected to somewhat restore consumer confidence and personal spending and that will put us on the road back.”

There is a psychological factor that Robert Shiller, a Yale economist, hopes will come into play.

“If we have massive infrastructure spending and people feel that it is working, it could create a sense that we are O.K. and people will go back to normal,” he said. “The real problem is that we are on hold. Everyone is.”

The expectation of most forecasters, several report, is that most of the Obama administration’s stimulus will go for public works projects and tax cuts.

With this sort of stimulus, the gross domestic product, the chief measure of the nation’s output, should begin to rise — if not in the third quarter, then certainly in the fourth, the forecasters say, and the unemployment rate will finally peak at 8 to 9 percent by early next year.

“The job insecurity is very serious; that is the worst aspect of all this,” said Albert Wojnilower, a consulting forecaster at Craig Drill Capital. “But most upturns in the economy have begun with upturns in consumption, when people who still have jobs stop worrying about losing them.”

Like other forecasters, Mr. Wojnilower expects the just-ended fourth quarter to be the recession’s worst, with the G.D.P. having contracted at a 4 or 5 or even 6 percent annual rate. Also like the others, he expects the economy to be growing again by the end of the year, although at an annual rate of 1 percent or less, which feels like a recession and is not enough to generate new jobs.

But the economy will no longer be contracting, and the recession that started in December 2007 will end at 18 or 21 months of age. The previous record holders, severe recessions in the mid-1970s and early 1980s, each lasted 16 months.

“I think that consumers are certainly in a state of shock right now, but their behavior is fundamentally rational,” said Martin Regalia, chief economist at the United States Chamber of Commerce. “They want to work, they want to make money and they want to spend that money. Above all they are resilient. They lick their wounds and with some help from government, they start back again and we come out of this quickly.”

A key to the revival, in every forecast, is home construction and home prices. The latter are still falling, at an even faster pace, adjusted for inflation, than in the Great Depression, according to the S.& P./Case-Shiller Home Price Indices.

That has the knock-on effect of multiplying foreclosures and trapping millions of people in homes that are worth less than their outstanding mortgages. Such circumstances inevitably depress spending and business investment.

But housing will probably bottom out by spring, many forecasters now argue. The Federal Reserve will play a role in making this happen by buying mortgage-backed securities and, in doing so, lowering the rate on 30-year mortgages to less than 5 percent, which is roughly the present level. That will encourage not only home buying, but also refinancing.

“In the midst of recession, with very sour moods, housing activity begins to improve because we get a big decline in mortgage rates,” said Robert Barbera, chief economist for ITT Investment Technology Group.

Then, too, the basic demographic demand for new homes, the forecasters say, is 1.7 million units a year. That many are not being built today, but with inventories shrinking and prices stabilizing, home construction will revive, many forecasters argue, contributing once again to economic growth.

“It is not fun to be a portent of doom,” Mr. Barbera said. “And even now in these doomlike times, we in the forecasting profession say it won’t last.”

Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company



To: Rock_nj who wrote (157213)1/3/2009 4:29:38 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362297
 
Nine Steps to Peace for Obama in the New Year

truthout.org

Thursday 01 January 2009

by: Deepak Chopra

Steps the incoming president can take to build a peace-based economy.

The following is a memo to Barack Obama from Deepak Chopra.

You have been elected by the first anti-war constituency since 1952, when Dwight D. Eisenhower was elected after promising to end the Korean War. But ending a war isn't the same as bringing peace. America has been on a war footing since the day after Pearl Harbor, 67 years ago. We spend more on our military than the next 16 countries combined. If you have a vision of change that goes to the heart of this country's deep problems, ending our dependence on war is far more important than ending our dependency on foreign oil.

The most immediate changes are economic. Unless it can make as much money as war, peace doesn't stand a chance. Since aerospace and military technologies remain the United States' most destructive export, fostering wars around the world, what steps can we take to reverse that trend and build a peace-based economy?

1. Scale out arms dealing and make it illegal by the year 2020.

2. Write into every defense contract a requirement for a peacetime project.

3. Subsidize conversion of military companies to peaceful uses with tax incentives and direct funding.

4. Convert military bases to housing for the poor.

5. Phase out all foreign military bases.

6. Require military personnel to devote part of their time to rebuilding infrastructure.

7. Call a moratorium on future weapons technologies.

8. Reduce armaments like destroyers and submarines that have no use against terrorism and were intended to defend against a superpower enemy that no longer exists.

9. Fully fund social services and take the balance out of the defense and homeland security budgets.

These are just the beginning. We don't lack creativity in coping with change. Without a conversion of our present war economy to a peace economy, the high profits of the military-industrial complex ensures that it will never end.

Do these nine steps seem unrealistic or fanciful? In various ways, other countries have adopted similar measures. The former Soviet army is occupied with farming and other peaceful work, for example. But comparisons are rather pointless, since only the United States is burdened with such a massive reliance on defense spending. Ultimately, empire follows the dollar. As a society, we want peace, and we want to be seen as a nation that promotes peace. For either ideal to come true, you as president must back up your vision of change with economic reality. So far, that hasn't happened under any of your predecessors. All hopes are pinned on you.

------------

Deepak Chopra is acknowledged as one of the world's greatest leaders in the field of mind-body medicine. He is the author of over 50 books, including "Buddha: A Story of Enlightenment" and "Ageless Body, Timeless Mind."



To: Rock_nj who wrote (157213)1/3/2009 7:51:33 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362297
 
Fed’s Evans Supports Stimulus, Sees ‘Sobering’ Debt (Update1)

By Vivien Lou Chen

Jan. 3 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago President Charles Evans said a large U.S. fiscal stimulus is “appropriate” yet “sobering,” given the “significant stress” facing the federal balance sheet.

“By historical standards, our current fiscal debt is not unusually large,” Evans said in the text of a speech today in San Francisco. “But our expected future obligations are enormous.”

Evans’s remarks come a day after a group of Democratic governors, led by New Jersey’s Jon Corzine, said President-elect Barack Obama should seek $1 trillion to stimulate the economy and offset state budget cuts. Economic data released in the past week shows U.S. consumer confidence sinking to the lowest level in at least 41 years, home prices in 20 major cities falling at the fastest rate on record and a decline in U.S. manufacturing deepening.

“I believe a big stimulus is appropriate,” Evans, 50, said during the annual meeting of the Allied Social Science Associations. “But it is also sobering to be deploying large amounts of taxpayer funds at a time when our fiscal balance sheet is already coming under significant stress,” he said, noting the federal debt is equal to 38 percent of gross domestic product.

Obama is working on a stimulus package of tax cuts and spending on roads, bridges and other infrastructure to create or save 3 million jobs. His advisers and congressional Democrats say the plan may total $850 billion.

Economic Slump

Fed policy makers cut the main U.S. interest rate last month to as low as zero for the first time in an effort to end the longest economic slump in a quarter-century. The central bank also shifted its focus to the amount and type of debt it buys, with a senior official saying that announcements of new lending programs or asset purchases will now be principal signals of policy.

One of the challenges confronting policy makers is “calibrating these unfamiliar policies and, in the future, determining the appropriate time and methods for winding them down,” Evans said.

“Policy makers face another very important challenge,” he said. “In a complex and dynamic environment, the public needs effective and transparent communications. As our lending facilities and other policy responses continue to evolve, this is a daunting task.”

“Undoubtedly, the greatest challenge we face is the enormous uncertainty of the situation,” he said.

Unexpectedly Fell

The Conference Board’s sentiment index unexpectedly fell to 38, the lowest reading since records began in 1967, the New York- based private research group said Dec. 30.

The S&P/Case-Shiller index of home prices declined 18 percent in the 12 months to October after dropping 17.4 percent in September. The gauge has fallen every month since January 2007.

The Institute for Supply Management’s factory index fell to 32.4, the lowest level since 1980. Readings less than 50 signal contraction.

Evans took office in September 2007, replacing Michael Moskow. Evans, a former director of research and senior vice president at the bank, is set to vote on interest rates this year.

He said the Fed should concentrate on designing regulatory policies “aimed at helping to prevent and protect against the consequences of asset price bubbles.” At the same time, such an aggressive campaign might “entail large downside costs if the assessment proves to be wrong,” Evans said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Vivien Lou Chen in San Francisco at vchen1@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: January 3, 2009 17:34 EST