Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (444302)	1/3/2009 1:13:29 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576884

>> No matter the armor, a large enough device can get them. Yes, but the key to "success" with an IED is being able to hide it, and the larger they get, the harder they are to hide. In addition, the technology for interrogating IEDs has improved radically over the last few years. Even EFPs have been largely ineffective against these new vehicles. I'm aware of one of these vehicles that recently took a direct hit with a very large IED. While the vehicle was damaged and had to have significant repairs, the personnel inside walked away without injury. I doubt if the Iraq-styled IEDs will be used to much effect if there is an intensive ground war over there. If for no other reason, because the population density is so high and the human intelligence is significant.