Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (3935)	1/6/2009 1:28:54 PM
From: Bearcatbob	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

mm- Every year that goes by, alternative energy technology improves and makes it more realistic. So every year that you guys continue to dig yourselves into the whole of denying that the world is moving towards alternative energy and denying that it will be profitable and commercially viable, is another year in which you are looking less prescient. Brumar -I welcome new forms of energy becoming viable and profitable. If and when I'm convinced that is happening, I'll try to invest there. I have no emotional reason not to. The above exchange is classic. No one in their right mind opposes alternate energy technology - especially anyone on the board. What is so cleverly missed in the discussion is that one fool thinks the best way to get there is to force it by saying "NO" to anything traditional. That is the train wreck method of change - that makes sane people wonder what the true agenda is. In numerical methods there is something known as a "time constant - tau". For the US and world the "time constant" is very large - meaning - you cannot turn a battleship on a dime - no matter how delusional one is - it cannot be done.