Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (445393)	1/6/2009 3:09:53 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574102

The point I was trying to make is i-node deals in speculation, innuendo and distortions. Evidence just gets in the way. This is bullshit. The only true "evidence" we have is that more votes were counted than the number of voters who showed up. ANY discrepancy such as this is indicative of a significant potential for voter fraud and cannot be allowed. The discrepancy must be eliminated or all votes involved are tainted. You have put forth NOTHING that would be considered "evidence". The ONLY real evidence is what I've stated above which clearly indicates the substantial likelihood that voter fraud was involved. The entire point of the internal control process is to insure that the number of votes cast is precisely equal to the number of voters who showed up to vote.