Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (31121)	1/6/2009 5:44:56 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Re: "Claiming is interesting but some evidence is required to convince rational people." Oh, I agree! Re: "There is overwhelming evidence that contradicts the Obama part of your claim" So you CLAIM. However, as none of what has been put forward has seemed to even interest the U.S. Supreme Court... and as the legal burden of proof remains with those who would allege that either Obama or McCain are 'ineligible' to serve as President, then that's exactly where things remain: Where's the PROOF (sufficient to convince the federal courts)????????????? Because the unverified frothing and ravings of oddball Web sites hardly qualifies for cocktail party chatter --- certainly nothing with the requisite legal heft.