SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (445707)1/7/2009 1:11:55 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575429
 
makes sense for gaza and west bank to be separate entities. Neither meets the prereqs for a state. Made more sense when WB was part of Jordan and Gaza part of Egypt. West Bank has the better chance to become economically viable. I dont know how tiny gaza can be. I go back to confederal idea, including israel, wb, gaza, perhaps jordan in some regional arrangement. Someone said several nations within one geographical state.



To: SilentZ who wrote (445707)1/7/2009 3:10:12 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575429
 
For Gaza and the WB to succeed as an independent state they have to connect.....for efficiency purposes. Going through Israel every time to get from one to the other will not work. That means there has to be some expansion of their land area.

Maybe they should be two states.

I don't think that will work economically. Landlocked WB needs Gaza for its seaport and Gaza needs WB for its water and grazing land.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News