Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BFree who wrote (41974)	1/7/2009 8:30:06 PM
From: queenleah	3 Recommendations Respond to of 42834

Just looking back I don't' see that you or Elan or Queen, Groniel, Midwest Investor, have anything at all to say about Bob Brinker in nearly all of your posts. Sometimes we just respond to those of you who can do nothing but make up new IDs and skip around the net to wherever you can bash and whine and lament about Brinker. In a sense, it's all the same thing.

To: BFree who wrote (41974)	1/7/2009 8:41:05 PM
From: octavian	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

BFree said: <<For instance if this were the President Elect Obama thread and if I were to say<< I am sure glad Obama won the election and will stimulate the economy to hopefully stop the downdraft and that many people I know can get back to work>> Would you find it logical to slam me for knowing people out of work, or would you think it more appropriate to discuss Obama's programs and words?>> --That's not a legitimate comparison. If a poster said "Obama lies," and I knew for a fact that the poster also lies, I would think it would be legitimate to point that out. When they criticize him for missing the bear market, I also think it's legitimate to point out that he was far from alone. But when they criticize him for covering up his mistakes, you won't see ME defending him. If someone who covers up his own mistakes accuses him of covering up his mistakes, you may very well see me pointing that out. <<Seems that when you resort to attacking those who have something to say about Bob Brinker that is true but that you don't approve of because you hold him in high esteem or want him to be more successful, you show that they are correct about him and you can't defend him with logic.>> --First, I'm not "attacking" anyone. Second, my personal opinion of Bob Brinker is much worse than you are assuming. I just don't like to see people who spin accuse him of spinning. <<Just looking back I don't' see that you or Elan or Queen, Groniel, Midwest Investor, have anything at all to say about Bob Brinker in nearly all of your posts.>> --You definitely didn't look closely enough at my posts.