Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (56847)	1/9/2009 2:50:02 PM
From: mph	2 Recommendations Respond to of 57110

No kidding!!! I've been outraged over that for a long time. Just goes to show how these politicians put it over on the public.

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (56847)	1/10/2009 11:26:27 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57110

so as to not muck up JP's thread with politics, I am responding to this message here: Message 25313555 While I disagree with pretty much everything you said (studdog), my point is that the crash of 2000 happened while Clinton was in office. And yet GWB was blamed for it. 9/11 was in planning for several years..which means it was planned during Clinton's presidency. It happened nine months after GWB took office. There is no way that he can be blamed for 9/11 happening. Those two things were a big bag of shit to start with. Just as Obama has big bags of shit to start with. What GWB doesn't get credit for is that there has not been a successful terrorist attack on U.S. soil. We know that isn't for lack of trying. If there had been a successfull attack after 9/11, he would have been criticized for not doing enough to stop it.