SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (176574)1/12/2009 2:09:19 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favorRespond to of 306849
 
Another 31% in Phoenix and cap rates might actually pencil out here.....if anyone's left to rent.<G/NG>



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (176574)1/12/2009 2:14:22 PM
From: PerspectiveRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Wow, that's gotta absolutely nuke any lending exposure banks have in those areas. Anything that does foreclose will return next to nothing. Even 50% LTV loans not safe. And why would any rational person keep paying on a mortgage if they are THAT far underwater? How many years' salary is a credit rating worth after all?

Wouldn't surprise me to see losses approaching 50% of loan exposure in some of those areas. No TARP big enough to cover these. Am I too pessimistic?

How come Florida bank stocks are even trading any more? FDIC should move to get these banks pawned off before the industry realizes just how bad they are.

`BC



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (176574)1/12/2009 3:32:24 PM
From: Smiling BobRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
If one purchased a house during the bubble, financed responsibly, but still is experiencing a loss in value; are they not just as entitled to some relief from the lender ie. shared loss in principal?

Why should only deadbeats get govt helpmenow $$$?