Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SiouxPal who wrote (158070)	1/13/2009 7:01:03 PM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 363107

Madoff to Attend His Bail Appeal Hearing in New York (Update1) By Allan Dodds Frank and David Glovin Jan. 13 (Bloomberg) -- Bernard Madoff will attend a hearing tomorrow in Manhattan federal court where U.S. prosecutors plan to challenge a magistrate’s decision yesterday allowing him to remain free on bail, his defense lawyer said. A judge will hear arguments on whether Madoff, the accused mastermind of the biggest Ponzi scheme in history, will remain out of jail as he decides how to plead to federal fraud charges. U.S. District Judge Lawrence McKenna scheduled arguments for 2:30 p.m. tomorrow. “We have a hearing,” Madoff’s lawyer Ira Sorkin said. Prosecutors filed court papers today asking McKenna to reverse a ruling yesterday by a U.S. magistrate judge allowing Madoff to remain free on $10 million bond. Madoff is under house arrest, watched by guards and subject to electronic monitoring. His lawyers must file their response tomorrow before the hearing. Madoff, 70, was charged last month with bilking investors in a $50 billion Ponzi scheme by using money from new investors to pay old ones. With government consent, he was freed Dec. 11 on bail. Last week, prosecutors asked that he be jailed for transferring jewelry to relatives. U.S. Magistrate Judge Ronald Ellis denied the request while imposing additional bail conditions. The case now goes before McKenna, who will consider whether Madoff’s transfer of property in violation of a court order in a related civil lawsuit means he’s a threat to flee or poses a risk to the community, as the government has argued. Court Order On Jan. 5, prosecutors said Madoff violated a court order in a Securities and Exchange Commission case by mailing Cartier and Tiffany watches, a ring, a diamond necklace and other jewelry in an effort to “dissipate” his assets. They said his violation of the order indicated he might flee the country. The property was worth more than $1 million, they said. Sorkin told Ellis last week that the mailings started Dec. 24 as Madoff and his wife Ruth began to “reach out” to immediate family and friends by giving them a few “sentimental personal items.” That evening, Ruth Madoff set aside items accumulated over 49 years of marriage and Madoff gathered watches he’d collected over the years. The couple, Sorkin said, mailed the items to their sons Andrew and Mark; to their daughters-in-law; to Ruth Madoff’s sister, Joan Roman; and to an unnamed married couple with whom they were close friends. It wasn’t until after Ruth Madoff met with lawyers on Dec. 30 that she realized they shouldn’t have done so, and the Madoffs began retrieving them, the lawyer said. Asset Transfer Ellis said an asset transfer may warrant jailing a criminal defendant, though it wasn’t called for in this case. Even for the most serious offenses, more than half of all defendants are released on bail, including 73 percent of those charged with fraud, he said in the ruling. “The issue at this stage of the criminal proceeding is not whether Madoff has been charged in perhaps the largest Ponzi scheme ever, nor whether Madoff’s actions should result in his widespread disapprobation by the public,” Ellis wrote in a 22- page opinion. At issue is “whether the government has carried its burden of demonstrating that no condition or combination of conditions can be set that will reasonably assure Madoff’s appearance and protect the community from danger.” The case is U.S. v. Madoff, 08-mag-2735, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan). To contact the reporters on this story: Allan Dodds Frank in New York at allanfrank@bloomberg.net and; David Glovin in New York federal court at dglovin@bloomberg.net. Last Updated: January 13, 2009 18:23 EST