Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SeachRE who wrote (151975)	1/14/2009 12:41:08 PM
From: one_less	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

I'm not interested in continuing to support your need to be exposed as a lying old perv. sorry. Find a new topic.

To: SeachRE who wrote (151975)	1/14/2009 1:29:40 PM
From: one_less	3 Recommendations Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 173976

"I'm sticking with the issue of bestiality and sadomasochism. That is serious stuff. So, let's concentrate on the meaty issues. Put up,... Sure. tip_o_the_iceburg. First you are lying ... again. Apparently you like repeating the lie about beastiality and sadomasochism which fits your persona of drawing attention to yourself in humiliating ways. I'm convinced you are getting off on it... but that's why we call you a lying old perv in the first place isn't it. yep I didn't say you are into beastiality, I said you asked us to keep your farm animal thingy a secret and here is the proof ... I was kidding you about your goat thingy and you said lets keep it a secret...Links as requested. But there's a GOAT shed out back, l'me check??? ....... ehhhh, nope, sorry somehow the word got around about you. Message 24873577 Let's keep it a secret... Message 24873586 I didn't say you are a sadomasochist I said "He has suggested some of his posts can be understood if you are into sadomasochism." Here is the link that supports that comment... as requested. "Never heard of sado-masochism??! You're so naive..." Message 24455563 I didn't say you retired from medical practice before the Reagan Administration. You've misinterpreted my statement which pointed out you claimed to be a Doctor since before the Reagan Administration and to have retired. Likely a lie on your part any way you want to look at it but you are nitpicking with an alternative interpretation ... Anyone can see there are at least two ways to interpret the statement "SeachRE implies that he has been retired from his medical career since before the Reagan Administration" ... so what, we can find dozens of alternate ways to interpret statements to make them false, that doesn't prove falsehood by the speaker. However, here are the posts that show your contradiction and likely prove you were lying... I'm NOT what I used to be(a Republican DOC). Message 24733058 I don't pretend to be a DOC, nor do I care about it. It's Irrelevant Message 24549881 The risk of malpractice is a factor but this has diminished markedly in part thanks to Reagan. Back then docs were sued just by looking funny at a patient(and this is no joke). I never had a suit or even a formal complain. Message 23969721