Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Westell WSTL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bill c. who wrote (7240)	10/23/1997 6:49:00 PM
From: Trey McAtee	Respond to of 21342

bill- so, bell canada wasnt one of the 3 contracts? thats really annoying. they could have made an announcement like ALA did, and boosted us a bit. anyone have any other info? was he defensive? did he sound beat? whats the deal? good luck to all, trey

To: bill c. who wrote (7240)	10/23/1997 6:50:00 PM
From: sargent	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21342

At least one of the 3 wasn't considered to be this BC announcement. I was a little worried, after hearing reading about the BC and ALA announcements, that WSTL would try to promote this as a win. How many times can you rewrite verbage??? Tell him to give us the facts and we can handle the press release...

To: bill c. who wrote (7240)	10/24/1997 4:24:00 AM
From: Eric Goethals	Respond to of 21342

Hi Bill, >> lost because of no dmt solution and fixed that on oct 1. << I was under the impression Westell learned a valuable lesson when they lost the ~80 million line JPC contract almost a year ago. It's taken another 20 million line region for them to fully understand this point. I'm not sure if we should blame Westell or MOT for losing Bell Canada. I now question why the deal wasn't done earlier. Back then . . . probably because at the time Amati just was not ready to dance. -Eric