SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RockyBalboa who wrote (16314)1/14/2009 5:13:23 PM
From: ggersh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71454
 
Who's next? could be a State, Pension fund, city, GS, just about anyone or anything....Buffett? He's been very quiet lately....



To: RockyBalboa who wrote (16314)1/14/2009 5:33:41 PM
From: Real Man1 Recommendation  Respond to of 71454
 
Many. The industry (hedge funds) is likely to get halved this
year, and there will be some desperate folks trying to hide
the losses. Bernie did commit accounting fraud no matter what,
enough to send him away for life.

As far as I vaguely remember, the real reason for Enron
"accounting scandal" were energy derivatives, but somehow
there is nothing about zad in this Wiki article -ggg-

en.wikipedia.org



To: RockyBalboa who wrote (16314)1/14/2009 7:30:20 PM
From: carranza22 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71454
 
I'm going to briefly summarize what a whistleblower is said to have told the SEC in 1999 and 2005:

1.- the fee basis was funky. undisclosed commissions rather than standard juicy hedge fund 2/20; Madoff left about 4% on the table. why?

2. the investors putting up the moolah didn't know Madoff was managing the money. the hedge funds investing in Madoff were prohibited from mentioning him. why? no questions get asked, that's why, including questions concerning a funky full o' holes investment strategy;

3. the counterparty risk for the two entities he used for his hedges, Merrill and UBS, was too high;

4. the writer says he heard from two funds of funds that Madoff subsidized bad months. if true, what better evidence of collusion or wilfull ignorance. or of a clean up of a Ponzi scheme to prevent redemptions;

5. no outside performance audits. ever.

6. going back 14 1/2 years, using a fund of funds numbers, the writer calculates that Madoff's returns were positive 96% of the time. this is the figure that does it for me. no way this can happen.

I've left a lot out because I don't understand it.

Madoff must be a real piece of work.



To: RockyBalboa who wrote (16314)1/16/2009 8:11:52 PM
From: RockyBalboa1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71454
 
Madoff's fund may not have made a single trade
Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:55am EST


By Jason Szep

BOSTON (Reuters) - Bernie Madoff's investment fund may never have executed a single trade, industry officials say, suggesting detailed statements mailed to investors each month may have been an elaborate mirage in a $50 billion fraud.

An industry-run regulator for brokerage firms said on Thursday there was no record of Madoff's investment fund placing trades through his brokerage operation.

That means Madoff either placed trades through other brokerage firms, a move industry officials consider unlikely, or he was not executing trades at all.

"Our exams showed no evidence of trading on behalf of the investment advisor, no evidence of any customer statements being generated by the broker-dealer," said Herb Perone, spokesman for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Madoff's broker-dealer operation, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, underwent routine examinations by FINRA and its predecessor, the National Association of Securities Dealers, every two years since it opened in 1960, Perone said.

Madoff, a former chairman of the Nasdaq Stock Market who was a force on Wall Street for nearly 50 years, allegedly confessed to his sons the firm's investment-advisory business was "basically a giant Ponzi scheme" and "one big lie," according to court documents.

He estimated losses of at least $50 billion from the Ponzi scheme, which uses money from new investors to pay distributions and redemptions to existing investors. Such schemes typically collapse when new funds dry up.

Each month, Madoff sent out elaborate statements of trades conducted by his broker-dealer. Last November, for example, he issued a statement to one investor showing he bought shares of Merck & Co Inc, Microsoft Corp, Exxon Mobil Corp and Amgen Inc among others.

It also showed transactions in Fidelity Investments' Spartan Fund. But Fidelity, the world's biggest mutual fund company, has no record of Madoff or his company making any investments in its funds.

DISCREPANCIES

"We are not aware of any investments by Madoff in our funds on behalf of his clients," Fidelity spokeswoman Anne Crowley said in an e-mail to Reuters.

Neither Madoff nor his firm was a client of Fidelity's Institutional Wealth Services business, their clearing firm National Financial or a financial intermediary client of its institutional services arm, she said.

"Consequently, his firm did not work with our intermediary businesses through which firms invest their clients' money in Fidelity funds," she added.

There also appear to be discrepancies between monthly statements sent to investors and the actual prices at which the stocks traded on Wall Street.

For example, his November statement showed he bought software maker Apple Inc's securities at $100.78 each on November 12, about a month before his arrest.

But Apple's stock on that day never traded above $93.24. The statement also showed he bought chip maker Intel Corp at $14.51 on November 12, but Intel's highest price on that day was $13.97.

"You could print up any statements you want on the computer and send it out to a client and the chances are the client wouldn't know, because they are getting a statement," said Neil Hackman, president and chief executive of Oak Financial Group, a Stamford, Connecticut-based investment advisory firm.

To some, the numbers did not add up.

About 10 years ago, Harry Markopolos, then chief investment officer at Rampart Investment Management Co in Boston, asked risk management consultant Daniel diBartolomeo to run Madoff's numbers after Markopolos tried to emulate Madoff's strategy.

DiBartolomeo ran regression analyses and various calculations, but failed to reconcile them. For a decade, Markopolos raised the issue with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which has come under fire in Congress in recent weeks for failing to act on Markopolos's warnings.

(Additional reporting by Muralikumar Anantharaman; Editing by Andre Grenon)
reuters.com



To: RockyBalboa who wrote (16314)1/16/2009 8:53:13 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71454
 
Who´s next? Here is one, small time ponzi, in relative terms:

Fund manager gone and possibly $350 million with him

heraldtribune.com



To: RockyBalboa who wrote (16314)2/19/2009 9:49:16 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Respond to of 71454
 
As I wondered a while back: Whos next?, here we go:

FBI tracks down Texas financier in fraud case
FBI track down billionaire Texan in Virginia, serve civil papers in SEC fraud case

* Devlin Barrett, Associated Press Writer
* Thursday February 19, 2009, 9:36 pm EST

* Yahoo! Buzz
* Print

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Texas financier R. Allen Stanford was tracked down Thursday in Virginia, where FBI agents served him with legal papers in a multibillion-dollar fraud case. FBI agents, acting at the request of the Securities and Exchange Commission, served Stanford court orders and other documents, the FBI and the SEC said.
<font color='#808080'> AP - In this Wednesday, June 11, 2008 file photo, Sir R. Allen Stanford waves at Lords Cricket Ground in ...</font>

AP - In this Wednesday, June 11, 2008 file photo, Sir R. Allen Stanford waves at Lords Cricket Ground in ...

Stanford is not under arrest and is not in custody.

In a civil complaint Tuesday, the SEC accused Stanford, two other executives and three of his companies with committing an $8 billion fraud that lured investors with promises of improbable and unsubstantiated high returns on certificates of deposit and other investments. It's not clear how much of the $8 billion was lost and how much investors might recover.

Until regulators got help Thursday from the FBI, the SEC had not been able to find Stanford.

A law enforcement official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the billionaire was served Thursday afternoon by an agent who had staked out a location in Fredericksburg, Va.

Around 1:45 p.m., the agent spotted Stanford in a car driven by Stanford's girlfriend. The agent spoke to Stanford, who was riding in the passenger side, the official said. The agent handed Stanford the SEC complaint, a federal court order freezing Stanford's assets and another order naming a receiver.

Stanford told the agent he understood and would make arrangements to surrender his passport, the official said.

Stanford has not been charged with any crime, though federal agents continue to investigate the case.

The fallout from the fraud case is already rattling around the global financial system.

Venezuela on Thursday seized a failed bank controlled by Stanford after a run on deposits there, while clients were prevented from withdrawing their money from Stanford International Bank and its affiliates in a half-dozen other countries.

Stanford's father, James, 81, told The Associated Press in Mexia, Texas, on Thursday that he hopes the allegations aren't true. "I have no earthly knowledge of it," said the elder Stanford, listed as chairman emeritus and a director for Stanford Financial Group. "I would be totally surprised if there would be truth to it. And disappointed, heartbroken."

He said he would tell his son to "Do the right thing."

Stanford, 58, is a larger-than-life figure in the Caribbean, using his personal fortune -- estimated at $2.2 billion by Forbes magazine -- to bankroll public works and cricket tournaments.

He also is a major player in U.S. politics, personally donating nearly a million dollars, mostly to Democrats. At 6-feet-4 and 240 pounds, he towered over House Speaker Nancy Pelosi while giving her a warm hug at the Democratic National Convention last year.

He owns a home in the U.S. Virgin Islands and operates businesses from Houston to Miami and Switzerland to Antigua, where he holds citizenship and the government knighted him in 2006 in recognition of his economic influence and charity work.

In an e-mail to his employees last week, Stanford said his company was cooperating with the probe and vowed to "fight with every breath to continue to uphold our good name and continue the legacy we have built together."

A federal judge appointed a receiver to identify and protect Stanford's assets worldwide, including about $8 billion managed by the Antigua-based Stanford International Bank, which has affiliates in Mexico, Panama, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela.

Also frozen were assets of Houston-based Stanford Capital Management and Stanford Group Co., which has 29 brokerage offices around the U.S.

Associated Press writers Marcy Gordon in Washington and Jamie Stengle in Mexia, Texas, contributed to this report.