Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (4230)	1/14/2009 6:36:39 PM
From: Bearcatbob	2 Recommendations Respond to of 86356

Carbon Nazis are the a bigger long term threat to the environment than the banks. We need to move to alternates and then have carbon fuels shrink as a result. Carbon reduction should be a consequence of change - not a forced change!

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (4230)	1/14/2009 7:36:38 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

And NOTHING about the loss of oceanic phytoplankton, which are FAR MORE responsible for CO2 sequestration than rain forest and has seen reductions of 30% in the oceans. So you are saying we can't trust the CEOs? I guess we have to fall back on the scientists. (Frankly I admit my GW stupidity. I don't have a clue if there is really a problem, much less if there is really a solution. You, on the other hand, seem to assume you ARE the ultimate expert on the subject. Keep it up... I'm just watching and eventually I'll form an opinion.)