Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorne who wrote (57635)	1/15/2009 12:52:46 AM
From: MJ	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224759

One would think that the DNC and Obama should use their funds to provide for security during the inaugural thereby saving the taxpayers $. Because Washington D.C. is the seat of the Federal Government most of the expense for security in D.C. is paid by the Federal Government. I am not surprised-------at the extra cost demand by Feinty----this could be the most difficult and expensive inaugural to manage in security in our history. Bush has no choice but to allocate more funds, given that the D.C. City Government is not able to fund those expenses nor will they ever be able to fund the expenses for crowds that come to D.C. for whatever purpose. A few more days and this madness will be past as we go to the next part of the Obama saga.