Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TopCat who wrote (447736)	1/15/2009 11:55:29 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575622

You're right, of course. And...I agree with you about Bill Richardson....I would have like to seen him in there. Remember that China was handed American nuclear secrets under Richardson's [mis]management of Los Alamos and DOE. One could understand it the first time. But then, he allowed it to continue. Some have claimed that Richardson was not responsible -- that it was the Clinton "administration's" fault. And while it is true that the administration stupidly continued to cooperate with China after the spying was found out, it does not change the fact that the buck should have stopped with Richardson. Richardson continued to support and lobby for a continuation of the program that allowed international scientists access to the program. Forget the corruption charges (which are Pay-to-Play, just as Blago's). Just look at his past performance.