Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (31513)	1/15/2009 5:19:23 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

If you say so.... But, speaking just personally here, I thought that article was more about the politics of achieving a political party capable of '50 plus one'. In other-words, given the demographics of now, and the projected ones of future years... the actual raw tactics of HOW to achieve a winning and governing-capable national majority. (And not just a strong regional base.) IMO, if national strength is the goal (more so then a goal related more to some standard of ideological fealty, irrespective of winning), then it would behoove BOTH sides of the Dem/Rep duopoly to look very closely at respect for individual freedoms... for Libertarian principles not the big government Authoritarianism that most often dominates the agendas for each. That is... if they want to assemble a winning majority that is capable of enduring....