Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mawork1 who wrote (8021)	10/23/1997 8:02:00 PM
From: Pugs	Respond to of 55532

I LOVE IT!!!! ITS' ALLLLLL NAYS!!!!, THE SQUEEZE IS SOOOOOO ON!!!!!, Best to all! ...like flies to poop!!!!,Pugs

To: mawork1 who wrote (8021)	10/23/1997 8:14:00 PM
From: Jack of All Trades	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Mawork1, I believe that it has posted on this thread many times by people that live in the Denver area that they have purchased RMCW water at local supermarket chains. Are you saying in posting this release that they do not exist? TIA JeffG

To: mawork1 who wrote (8021)	10/23/1997 8:38:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

To: Riley G (5291 ) From: GJC Tuesday, Oct 14 1997 1:59PM EST Reply #5294 of 5296 >From Dempsey Mork's financial filings...He admits they SHORT as part of their POLICY!!! Organization and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Company's Margin Transactions In the normal course of business, Global sells securities not yet purchased (short sales) for its own account. The establishment of short positions exposes Global to off-balance sheet market risk in the event prices increase, as Global may be obligated to acquire the securities at prevailing market prices. Customers' Margin Transactions The activities of Company customers are transacted on either a cash or margin basis through the facilities of its clearing broker. In margin transactions, the clearing broker extends credit to the customers, subject to various regulatory and margin requirements, collateralized by cash and securities in the customer's account. In connection with these activities, the clearing broker executes and clears customer transactions involving the sale of securities not yet purchased ("short sales"). These transactions may expose the Company to significant of off- balance sheet risk in the event margin requirements are not sufficient to fully cover losses which the customers may incur. In the event the customers fail to satisfy their obligations to the clearing broker, the Company may be required to compensate the clearing broker for losses incurred on behalf of its customers.

To: mawork1 who wrote (8021)	10/23/1997 8:39:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Links to Dempsey Mork & Associates DEVELOPMENT Bancorp (OBB:DVBC) edgar-online.com sec.yahoo.com ---- DEVELOPMENT BNCP (OBB:DVBC) News. Wednesday March 5 9:58 AM EDT Development Bancorp announces an agreement with Societe Financiere Privee INDIAN WELLS, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 5, 1997-- Development Bancorp Ltd announced today that they had entered into an agreement with Societe Financiere Privee (SFP), a Swiss private bank, to act as its U.S. representative. Development Bancorp will identify investment opportunities in the United States for SFP and introduce their private banking. Development Bancorp had previously announced that it had made a strategic investment in SFP. More information on the company is available from Bloomberg Business Services. For any further information, contact Randall Baker at the corporate offices, telephone760/360-5793. CONTACT: Randall Baker,760/360-5793

To: mawork1 who wrote (8021)	10/23/1997 8:40:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

DEVELOPMENT BANCORP, LTD (OBB: DVBC) 74-900 HWY 111 SUITES 121 & 123 PALM DESERT CA 92260 TEL: 760 776-9331 CHIEF EXECUTIVE: DEMPSEY K MORK, PRES =========================================================== BUSINESS TYPE: Corporation - Profit DATE INCORPORATED: 06/16/1984 STATE OF INCORP: Washington ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 10/18/96 DEMPSEY K MORK, PRES RICCARDO MORTARA, V PRES JEHU HAND, SEC Business started 1984 by officers. DEMPSEY K MORK. Antecedents undetermined. RICCARDO MORTARA. Antecedents undetermined. JEHU HAND. Antecedents undetermined. EMPLOYEES: 6 which includes officer(s). FACILITIES: Occupies premises in building. LOCATION: Undetermined section. ============================================================ Riley G

To: mawork1 who wrote (8021)	10/23/1997 8:42:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

To: Riley G (5502 ) From: s martin Wednesday, Oct 15 1997 11:53AM EST Reply #5511 of 5513 Your take is wrong.. Palco nixed the deal prior to OVIS announcing it and it is not delayed, it's off. --------- My response: Who really cares if the Palco deal is on or off. With a million dollar PLUS cash infusion into the clothing end the clothing end can expand it's market into the fitness line on it's own. 1. Why buy for a company with only 100,000 in revenues? 2. Why pay the name "Hardcore", when they can launch their own fitness clothing line using the Rocky Mountain Fitness / Sports Clothing name? Riley G For my list only: I found out that the Palco deal is dead. As Palco wanted $1.7 million dollars for the name hardcore. Palco is only doing 100,000 a year in revenues, and failed to hand over the books for an audit. I'm glad that Gary did not follow through on this deal, as it's not cost effective, nor beneficial to us shareholders...

To: mawork1 who wrote (8021)	10/23/1997 8:42:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

To: RBM (5627 ) From: Riley G Wednesday, Oct 15 1997 7:31PM EST Reply #5629 of 5629 A blast from the past... siliconinvestor.com Geez, I wonder why no named defendants have been served in this matter. After all Gary Morgan had them served in the Olympus Ventures, Inc. Federal Court case!!! I believe that D. Mork filed Case No.: SC049037 in the SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, just to so he or his representatives could file a negative press release on the wire services in an attempt to decrease the value of the OVIS stock in his attempts to cover his short position in the OVIS market. Note item 4. were he claims to be a shareholder on Sept. 17th, 1997 (which means Aug. 5th, 1997 - Sept. 17th, 1997) --insert item 4.--- THE PARTIES 4. Plaintiff MAGELLAN LITIGATION SERVICES, INC. ("MAGELLAN") has been assigned all rights and interests in any cause of action held by shareholder DEMPSEY MORK ("MORK"). ---end insert------ What a laugh this is. We all know why he (Mork) did not follow through with the legal process! Serve me, Riley G RMIL#00 wanting to be DOE#01

To: mawork1 who wrote (8021)	10/23/1997 8:44:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 12:09:25 -0500 Riley, I've been looking at bottled water companies so that I could get a better idea of what this merger means to shareholders of RMIL. Take a look at VPUR in yahoo, then go to their profile. This is a "regional water bottler" with shares outstanding of about 10 million, and a float of like 8 million, that lost in the neighborhood of 4 hundred thousand dollars last year. Stock price today? Around 3 1/2, up from 2 a short few weeks ago. Apparently small bottlers like RMIL can command a pretty big market capitalization. The nays have really distorted reality on this issue. Some thoughts by the way: They said no one would do business with OVIS, and now we have RMIL They said we'd never get a TA, but we have one now. They said nobody was shorting the stock, but the company that bad mouthed OVIS is a known (admitted) professional shorter. They said we'd get sued, but the suit never got delivered. They said we didn't hold the float, but a simple check of the float and some e-mails between friendly investors confirms we do. They said we were crazy to think the MM's would get caught with their pants down (after all, they're professionals) - but now it is so very hard to get a simple request for certs to leave your brokers desk. gee why? They said the stock would tank any day, but we're higher now than a month ago. They said they were just trying to "help us" (nays) but got so hostile that some were actually kicked off SI. They said they were simple investors with a bearish opinion - simple investors who don't own any stock, with time to post 24 hours around the clock, and multiple subscriptions to SI. They said RM didn't have permission to take water out of the ground, but they lied, and you can go buy some of this water if you like. They said RM sold tap water (an admission that the company sells water), but failed to mention that the "tap" was the pipe from the artesian well, which the town of ten sleep is fortunate enough to drink from as well. They said we were cowards for not posting real names, so we did, and now we see they have hidden themselves behind layers of misinformation. They said OVIS didn't exist, but my schwab account says I own it. They said OVIS didn't make clothes, but stores are currently stocked with those clothes. They said the company wasn't registered, but it is. They tried to steal its name, but they couldn't. They said the float was massive (Carl Sagan: billions and billions), but a simple call and the TA assured me this was false. They said the plant was closed, but an investor here went and looked at the plant (THE INSIDE OF THE PLANT) and saw that it was running. They said Morgan was a scam artist, but a review of public information shows that he's a respected and accomplished businessman with a great resume (while his apparent accusers have the strangest bios I've ever seen). They want you to sell your shares and buy them back later, to protect your profits (???) - of course giving the shorters another month to play with them while you start the cert calling game all over again. Mork, a guy who admits he has lost money on OVIS as an investor in his lawsuit?(short?), has the audacity to have a company that he owns print false news to the world? They tell you the company is shady, but Mork uses the same TA that OVIS had trouble with? They call us "slimey yays" and have the cowardice to post unverifiable opinion with the full knowledge that it will affect public opinion, and even go so far as to create a horribly slanderous web page to that effect. (a pretty nice web page at that. must have cost someone some money and time. I wonder why) Sorry if I'm rambling. I could go on and on. I would love to take a week off and document every lie, but unfortunately, I don't have as much time as the naysayers. Wish I did.

To: mawork1 who wrote (8021)	10/23/1997 8:45:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

forward from aol's rmil message board. --------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Revenues??? From: mclay59631 Date: 18 Oct 1997 10:23:47 EDT Lupo never owned this stock and if he did and made all that money why would he be so negative on the stock. Listren my friends...don't get caught up by all of the naysayers. For all that you know...we the cartel could be an old lady in a rocking chair that sends out messages under different names all day long. That's a possibility I guess. BUT IT"S NOT TRUE. We are savy investors who have taken back a position and left the illegal shorts corned in the market. The short play is already in motion and cannot be stopped. They only point to people bashing a OTC board stock now is becaues they have to buy the shares now on the open market and we, the long shareholders, now control the selling price. In theory, if we all styed long until $300 was hit in share price..think of how much stock you own yourself and how much they have to buy. The numbers are high and they are now cornered. Just ask yourself some simple questions... 1. Why would anybody are a group of naysayers spend morning noon and night trying to trash a stock that supposedly made them over $250,000 each? Doesn't make sense to me. 2. Why is it such a crime to ask for something that you own and that you want to hold? 3. Why is it such a scam to bypass the IPO process when the big winners initially are the underwriters and investment bankers? 4. What everyone shpould be focused on is the managment, market, and product that RMIL is now ready and poised to tackle. That is the real story here besides the short positions. 5. And everyone do some simple research: Short squeezes do exsist...and with all of the negative people desperately, YES, remember...DESPERATELY, trying to shake shares loose...ash yourself why? Why are people so angry at a stock that made them alot of quick money? Just think about it long and hard. Remember...many things in life are very simple in concept. And this situation is no different. 1. Buy 2. Call for cert's 3. Complain the the SEC if not handled immediately 4. Relax..take a deep breath...and let's wait for the ride. One last point: Here are some stocks that I have owned last year: 1. JBIL...8 to 140 2. CTN...9 to 110 3. NYER 4 to 31 4. CADE 1.3/8 to 3 7/8 And Rileys; 1. GST...5 to 16 2. LOCKC 1/2 to 5 7/8 3. PM...5...14 We know what we're doing..and so do the naysayers...that's the point. INHO ======== My added comments. I also had 10,000 BTIM at 3 to 4 and sold a few months later at 25-28 I also had 10,000 RESI (now IASI) at 3 and sold a few months later at 40. Riley G

To: mawork1 who wrote (8021)	10/23/1997 8:46:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

From: Pinerolo@aol.com Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 11:57:47 -0400 (EDT) Subject: YOU LIE! YOU HAVE BETRAYED YOUR BROTHERS AND HAVE MISLED ALL THOSE WHO TRUSTED YOU. TRUE YOU STILL HAVE YOUR OVIS But your PARTNERS IN THIS CRIME HAVE BEEN SELLING WHILE THOSE WHO TRUSTED YOU ARE STILL BUYING. Judia's traitor . The Judge ---------- From: Pinerolo@aol.com Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 12:10:58 -0400 (EDT) Subject: You Lied Why betray us in this state wide scheme you and your friends have been selling while others are buying yes its true and your being judged. We now know the truth your friends are selling. The JUDGE ---------- From: Pinerolo@aol.com Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 15:37:38 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Can't Take It can you? Truth is hard to take betrayal is just as hard. Yellow is your color. The Judge ----------- From: Pinerolo@aol.com Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 16:28:34 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Can't Take It can you? Why are you threatening us with your nonsense? You recomended the stock. The Judge ---------- Pinerolo: Then you may have purchased under a dollar but don't expect RMIL to go any higher unless your willing to drive the price up and we both know were the ones who control the market! Psicop007: I may just buy 1 million and file my SEC statements..... Psicop007: Try .19 cent to .24 cents..... Psicop007: eat that JUDGE! Pinerolo: You don't have that kind of money we know your strengths and weaknesses. As was said under a dollar your a penny buyer not a threat to us. Psicop007: Hide and watch then. We have only 150k before the float is in all name form, with 1 million NAME requests behind that. Better try a little harder. Pinerolo: Listen while you still believe in your so called cartel Michael has been out well can't blame him at 3.50 and ran to the bank think hard ask your cartel to prove they have us in a short squeeze its was a game you played out of your league!!!!!!!!!! Stay in the minors. Psicop007: I did not trade some 8 million dollars into one of my other accounts last year by not knowing my business . So look out as I have you beat, and you guys are running scared! Pinerolo: Scared we have drinks at the Newport Marine restaurant and laugh at you and your frantic antics we sold and are covered thanks to your followers impaient attitudes we win check mate. And learn how to spell. Psicop007: The facts are I captured the whole float in less than a week and have since double it in the foundation... You guys are dead in the water. I can not wait until that last certificate is issued this week or next. Short calls all around! Psicop007: So who do you work for then? Psicop007: Dead in the water...Just as I have said as I know of over 2 million shares that must be covered in the foundation alone! Keep talking that cheap crap. Psicop007: The cartel is not selling anyshares until the mid 50's know! Pinerolo: Then we will wait one week and have a bigger laugh in fact I will opt to post this correspondance on the board . I feel down right sorry for you but you should have bought all the shares yourself and not trusted your so called cartel. Then the squeeze would have worket and as Mort would say eat or drink ask the old TA about that one. Psicop007: I beat you to it already.

To: mawork1 who wrote (8021)	10/23/1997 8:47:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

My response to the repeated NAYS. I have raised my selling range again. Riley G --- siliconinvestor.com To: Skeeter Bug (6902 ) From: Riley G Tuesday, Oct 21 1997 11:44AM EST Reply #6904 of 6905 READ ALL!!!!!!!! Skeeter Bug, I must admit that the nays have got me beat. I will sell 865 shares at $52.625 rather than the $35 to $45 range. I am sorry but I will be selling up the ladder from the 50's through the multi-hundreds now. You have converted me..... Here's how I plan to sell my shares through a slow steady upward process. Others may want to model a slow steady sell after this. I have no control of how you do it. As in all investments, this is only a template! Stock Price Sell percentage xx-xx 3% to 5% of position (cover buy in and nice profit) xx-xx another 5% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% ================================================ It is a simple matter to replace the xxx-xxx's with the starting price ranges that you want to start selling off shares. This method does not flood the market with shares and allows the stock price to grow as you sell a little here and there. You don't have to sell them in a day, two, or a month. You just follow your own set selling plan. I have said that I am not selling any shares until the mid. $50 to $65 range, and then about 865 shares of my position! I do not sell on even numbers, I have plans on selling at odd places like EXAMPLE....200 shares at $52.625, 300 shares at $58.125,etc..... Riley G

To: mawork1 who wrote (8021)	10/23/1997 8:48:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

To: Riley G (6917 ) From: Tom R. Clarksburg Tuesday, Oct 21 1997 12:41PM EST Reply #6925 of 6930 RUMOR>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Riley just finished speaking with my broker friend at Everen Securities. Apparently, he just learned that another Everen broker, with discretion over his client accounts,just submitted a request for delivery of 950,000 shares of RMIL stock. This represents 65 of his clients. If true, that request should hit the new TA today. Regards TOM PS. CAVIAT.....this is what I heard and as of yet, unconfirmed.

To: mawork1 who wrote (8021)	10/23/1997 8:49:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 12:27:24 -0400 There has been no action in Dempsey Morks listed company DVBC for some time now. Well look at it today...Is someone shorting it or is Dempsey Mork Selling off shares to get money ready to start buying back his RMIL shorts? His volume is 64,500 sells today when his normal volume is 0. Riley G ------------------------------------------------------------------------- DEVELOPMENT BANCORP, LTD (OBB: DVBC) 74-900 HWY 111 SUITES 121 & 123 PALM DESERT CA 92260 TEL: 760 776-9331 CHIEF EXECUTIVE: DEMPSEY K MORK, PRES ============================================ BUSINESS TYPE: Corporation - Profit DATE INCORPORATED: 06/16/1984 STATE OF INCORP: Washington ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 10/18/96 DEMPSEY K MORK, PRES RICCARDO MORTARA, V PRES JEHU HAND, SEC Business started 1984 by officers. DEMPSEY K MORK. Antecedents undetermined. RICCARDO MORTARA. Antecedents undetermined. JEHU HAND. Antecedents undetermined. EMPLOYEES: 6 which includes officer(s). FACILITIES: Occupies premises in building. LOCATION: Undetermined section. ==============================================

To: mawork1 who wrote (8021)	10/23/1997 9:33:00 PM
From: Kurt N	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

For that I am doubling my my mininum initial selling price. I've lost count keeping track of the penalties, so I'd be willing to settle RIGHT now for $400.00 for all my shares. For every punch below the belt (and this was one) I will tack on to what I feel is appropriate shareholder value. Since you and your buddies aren't gonna fight fair, that's fine with me. The gloves are off. Kurt