Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (448002)	1/16/2009 10:34:38 AM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 1572942

Sorry....there was no actionable intel in the PDB....generalized warnings are not actionable...

To: combjelly who wrote (448002)	1/16/2009 10:35:37 AM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1572942

>> Terrorism was considered to be a weird obsession of Clinton's. The fact is, and everyone pretty much knows this at this point, that Clinton was weak because he didn't understand it was a war. You cannot hold enemy combatants to the same legal standards you do common criminals -- not and expect to win the struggle. I don't think Bush did either -- when he arrived in office. However, after 9/11, he knew we had to make fundamental changes. The Left was all about it -- for a year or so (well, except for Richard Gere). But as I predicted on this thread, the Left's short memory ended up gutting their will to defeat terrorism. The next attack, when it happens, will have been a direct result of liberal weakness. Which is why liberal presidents should never, ever be elected.