Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (105831)	1/18/2009 7:57:24 PM
From: scion	Respond to of 122087

Message 25334491

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (105831)	1/18/2009 9:18:20 PM
From: scion	Respond to of 122087

Altomare and Gunderson argue two points on appeal. They contend first that they did not violate section 5 of the Securities Act because the shares they issued to various consultants were exempt from registration pursuant to sections 1125(e) and 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code. They assert next that there were genuine issues of fact as to their state of mind so as to make summary judgment with respect to the fraud claims inappropriate. Having carefully considered the record, we find these arguments to be without merit. Substantially for the reasons stated in the district court's thorough and thoughtful opinion and order, SEC v. Universal Express, Inc., 475 F. Supp. 2d 412 (S.D.N.Y. 2007), the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. FOR THE COURT: CATHERINE O'HAGAN OLFE, CLERK Doc 382 OCR extract Message 25334604