Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (448530)	1/19/2009 10:50:57 AM
From: jlallen	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573835

lol Your post is a perfect example revisionist history.... Bush had his share of failures.....undeniably compounded by the sniping and bile spewed by left wing morons.... Most Americans do not approve of Bush's job performance, and rightfully so....but a large majority also believe he is a decent human being.....Bush haters rhetoric nothwithstanding....

To: Alighieri who wrote (448530)	1/19/2009 11:20:55 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573835

Bush decided to become president of the republican party or at least the part of the GOP that was in power. Everything obama does is the opposite of what bush did at least after the 04 election. I used to fight with the bush true believers during the 04 election about lack of inclusion and narrow victories that didnt give him consensus to govern. And i voted for bush in 04 and got the boot from the rt wing thread anyhow for not towing the line. Now they yap about poor bush---it was a conscious decision by cheney and rove to govern from almost a minority position. Actually since they dont count minorities, women or gays as real americans, they decided to govern with their white man majority. Ask inode, we are probably not white, hetero, or man enough to have our positions considered.