Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (448711)	1/19/2009 3:08:55 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576969

But it hasn't been. There is never 100% consensus, especially in the scientific community. No, there isn't 100% consensus and never will be. But there is a lack of consensus, which means that it is disproven, and is relegated to the status of the hypothetical. I've run the numbers and posted them. The amount of CO2 due to burning of coal alone is a substantial fraction of the total atmospheric CO2 concentration in a given year's time. To claim that cannot have an effect is, well, ignorant at best. READ MY LIPS: It doesn't MATTER. At ALL. FORGET IT. Get some sleep. Nobody cares, unless they are just politically motivated. GW is simply a disproven hypothesis.