SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (4329)1/19/2009 7:10:41 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86356
 
As for windmills, if people were building them in order to capture tax credits, rather than creating a viable, it stands to reason that the artificially manufactured government inducement (tax credits) is no longer as attractive as before.

My energy rates just went up 20%+ to pay for a Florida nuke plant that won't go on line for at least 7 years.... assuming it gets built at all. A rate increase mandated by the government. That's not tax credits, that's 7 years of up front cash.

Please don't preach about the 'free market' purity of traditional energy plants. The electric utilities are as close as you can get to a pure government agency without being one.

Alt energy is David to the traditional energy Goliath (with all the lobbyists, vested interests, politicians in pocket, etc) that that implies. The last thing the utilities/government want is 'distributed energy production' that they don't control for profit... and that the politicians can't tax.

Wake up.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (4329)1/20/2009 3:50:49 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86356
 
Oil profits are largely an illusion when you account for all the tax incentives and military subsidies they get. So don't give us that crap about alternative energy incentives.