SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (448818)1/19/2009 8:14:43 PM
From: jlallen5 Recommendations  Respond to of 1576297
 
eviscerating our Constitution."

This claim is made by the ignorant (like bentpig, rejek, etc.)....Facts are that Bush confronted a number of difficult issues for which there was little or no precedential guidance....in no case did he proceed without supporting legal opinions....what any prudent exec. would do....many of those decisions were challenged in court and some went against his position.....in none of those cases did he tell the Court to got screw itself....he complied....that's the way the system works....

Only idiots believe that the Constitution was "eviscerated"....

J.



To: i-node who wrote (448818)1/19/2009 8:39:42 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576297
 
The courts have ruled against Bush many, many times, including the Supreme Court:

google.com



To: i-node who wrote (448818)1/20/2009 12:11:11 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1576297
 
She says he is "leaving with no accountability for eviscerating our Constitution."

You people keep saying this but none of you can explain exactly how Bush "eviscerated" our Constitution. What, exactly, did he do that was unconstitutional, and why in hell didn't someone challenge it in the Supreme Court if he did?


Like the video I posted and you claimed did not exist, it has been explained to you in many different ways. Your ideology does not allow you to hear it.