SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (449130)1/20/2009 6:07:02 PM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575608
 
"Then there really is no issue here, because atmospheric CO2 isn't anywhere close to the levels at which people can't breathe."

That is true.

"Hence CO2 is not a pollutant."

That would only be true if the only negative effect CO2 could have is making the atmosphere unbreathable. That, however, isn't the case.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (449130)1/21/2009 9:33:30 AM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575608
 
>End of story, unless you and SilentZ want to choose the definition that fits the "climate change" agenda.

I don't understand the "'climate change' agenda." Why would someone want to have such an agenda? What's there to be gained? There's plenty to be gained by denying if, but what's there to be gained by affirming it?

-Z


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News