Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taro who wrote (449403)	1/21/2009 2:35:01 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576346

"The ocean water volume obviously is enormous. " Sure. But it wouldn't immediately disperse throughout the whole water column. That takes time. Like millenia. So most is going to be concentrated in the upper few meters. Which, oddly enough, is where most of the biomass is. "And wouldn't that be beneficial in our days of cutting down the rain forests?" Replacing forests with grasslands or crops isn't going to be compensated for much by increasing CO2. Trees sequester a lot more carbon per unit area than the alternatives.