Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (449460)	1/21/2009 3:34:04 PM
From: Road Walker	Respond to of 1575565

I'll repeat my question: What was he convicted of? (Answer: Nothing). Unless he gets a trial at Gitmo, he will NOT be convicted of anything. Why do you say that. He's confessed, several times, in Gitmo court. Of course he would be convicted.

To: i-node who wrote (449460)	1/21/2009 4:11:22 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575565

"You can't try them, because they WOULDN'T be convicted in a plain-old trial. " Why IS this Dave? Could it be because most of the people in Gitmo were turned in by Afghan bounty hunters in exchange for $10-40k, not "captured on the battlefield" as Bush lied, and we have only their word that they were guilty of being AQ? That IS the case you know. The fact is, we have NO EVIDENCE to hold many if not most of the people we have there. When that comes out IN the trials, Bush will look even worse than he does now.