SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (449487)1/21/2009 4:06:41 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1577225
 
He cant be convicted. Arent you afraid to let him go if you cant get a conviction??? You just cant let a guy like that go free. OTOH, bin ladens driver was ridicuous not to mention the innocents who were held there for years. Again the bush admin slipped on the slippery slope. There is no reason for smart folks to slip. Cheney went out in a wheel chair and bush in a copter. Gonzales is picking lettuce somewhere scared to death that tejek and wharfy are coming to get him. They are all gone. Now we have leaders who we can trust to use extraordinary means only in extraordinary situations. Can no one on the left see this?



To: Road Walker who wrote (449487)1/21/2009 4:26:17 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577225
 
Of course those are not the options. Why are you afraid to try him?

They are the options.

I'm not "afraid" to try him, it just isn't appropriate to do so.

He isn't a criminal. He is a soldier in a war against us. There is no provision in our Constitution for trying soldiers in wars against us.

The problem, of course, is that in a trial the detainee would be afforded various rights and privileges that inure to the benefit of citizens of the United States which are not appropriate for enemy combatants.

For example, you cannot have a standard for conviction of "beyond a reasonable doubt", you cannot be pulling soldiers off the battlefield to testify as we do with cops, we don't Mirandize detainees, and shouldn't, and there are at least 500 other reasons it would not be appropriate.

I think you have said your wife is an attorney, have you ever discussed this stuff with her? I would think she would be aware of these issues, perhaps she could clarify it for you ;)



To: Road Walker who wrote (449487)1/21/2009 4:34:24 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577225
 
One of the reasons criminal trials with all the rights afforded under the Constitution may not work is the risk of exposure of the methods which are used to develop actionable intel...

J.