SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael97123 who wrote (449743)1/22/2009 11:17:59 AM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576600
 
KSM’s revelations helped authorities identify and incarcerate at least six major terrorists:

article.nationalreview.com



To: michael97123 who wrote (449743)1/22/2009 2:49:24 PM
From: Taro  Respond to of 1576600
 
As far as I know it's only about one case, a very major case though.
Forgot those names and am too lazy to google on them, got it?

Taro



To: michael97123 who wrote (449743)1/22/2009 3:15:11 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576600
 
ABC News Reporter Brian Ross said it. I don't know what his source was.

His exact quote was:

"In the case of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the information was very valuable, particularly names and addresses of people who were involved with al Qaeda in this country and in Europe.

And in one particular plot, which would involve an airline attack on the tallest building in Los Angeles, known as the Library Tower."

He claimed that more than a dozen AQ plots to kill people were stopped specifically from information the got from coerced interrogation. Now, as a news man he is not required to divulge his sources, but when asked outrigth whether he believed what he learned from those sources, he said he did. I watched the interview on TV. So, that's all the proof I have.

I would say also that this position has been corroborated (i.e., that this information saved lives) by former CIA Agent John Kiriakou, who now opposes the use of waterboarding as "unnecessary" since he believes we now have a handle on the situation and he DOES believe it is torture.

MY interpretation of his remarks (you can read them and make your own) is that there is no reason to be torturing people at this point because the threat isn't what it used to be.

Which is probably something I'd agree with and certainly, it is consistent with Bush administration policy.