Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ksuave who wrote (31708)	1/22/2009 4:24:09 PM
From: Steve Dietrich	Respond to of 71588

I knew it! SD

To: ksuave who wrote (31708)	1/22/2009 4:53:18 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

What happened to the world loving Obama ? Chinese media issues stinging attack on Barack Obama and George W Bush Chinese state media have launched an unexpected broadside at both departing President George W. Bush and his successor, President Barack Obama. telegraph.co.uk >>China Daily, the official English-language newspaper used to signal the Communist Party's views to the outside world, said President Bush had taken a "wrecking-ball" to world affairs. Its stinging rebuke was in marked contrast to previous commentary by Party advisers which stressed President Bush's successes in improving ties with Beijing. The comments, in the paper's main editorial, went on to express scepticism for President Obama's vision of remaking America. "The US leaders have never been shy of talking about their country's ambition to be the leader of the world," it said, sarcastically. "For them, it is a divinely granted destiny no matter what other nations think." It said more was required than just the "goodwill" Mr Obama might generate around the world. The financial crisis would limit his power to act, put strains on overseas alliances and lead to clashes with other countries' interests, it said. He would most probably fail to win wars in Iraq or Afghanistan, broker peace in the Middle East, prevent Iran building a nuclear programme, or stabilise African countries. "The realities on the ground are more complex than presented by Obama," it concluded. The new hard line may reflect individual embarrassment by China Daily, the only major state media not to censor Mr Obama's speech yesterday. In fact, it carried the comments from his inaugural address saying that regimes which crush dissent are "on the wrong side of history" on its front page. Yet China also sees current American weakness, due to the financial crisis and the unpopularity of the war in Iraq, as an opportunity for promoting its different approach to both internal governance and external relations on the world stage. It has been effusive in its praise for President Bush's conciliatory stance towards Beijing - and his insistence on attending the opening ceremony of the Olympics last year, despite calls for a boycott. But it clearly felt its basic dislike of American interventionist policies be restated. "The world was holding its breath awaiting the end of President George W. Bush's wrecking-ball approach to world affairs," it said. The paper also carried an aggressive commentary denouncing Henry Paulson, the outgoing treasury secretary, and Ben Bernanke, chairman of the US Federal Reserve, for suggesting that China might be partially responsible for the financial crisis for allowing savings to rise and consumption to fall. "These remarks exhibit the obvious intention of the top US financial authorities to shirk their responsibilities for poor financial performances and shift domestic dissatisfactions to other countries," wrote Shen Dingli, an international relations professor at Shanghai's Fudan University who also advises the government.<< Etc