SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (152816)1/22/2009 6:53:47 PM
From: one_less1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
When I tried to talk to him about the science of time, substance coming from nothing, awareness, consciousness and other non-physical facts and realities, he does the same thing. For a proclaimed 'scientist' he sure has a strange aversion to exploring the abstract and new ideas.



To: Bill who wrote (152816)1/22/2009 7:02:11 PM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Thats a question science has answered. He just doesn't like the answer.



To: Bill who wrote (152816)1/22/2009 7:13:48 PM
From: Steve Dietrich  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
What does science have to do with it?

Either a fetus has a right to stay in its mother's womb regardless of whether or not the mother wants it there or it doesn't.

That's the debate. It's not a scientific question. It's a moral one.

If someone needs a kidney transplant or they'll die, does that give them the right to another person's kidney?

Hospitals pull the plug on people who are scientifically alive all the time. Do they have that right?

SD


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News