Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (4452)	1/23/2009 4:49:22 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

What will you do when the debate really is over about how much CO2 is caused by humans? Thats not even an issue.

To: RetiredNow who wrote (4452)	1/23/2009 5:49:04 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 86356

What will you do when the debate really is over about how much CO2 is caused by humans? Will you acknowledge the data coming from the Japanese and US satellites as hard science? Oh great.. now you'll be haranguing us with data from a Japanese "Fart Sat". I mean, come on.. we all know that people and animals emit CO2 and methane. The path your taking is obviously Malthusian because the only solution would be to decrease the population in order to "save the planet" (as if the planet needed saving considering what "Mother Nature" has wrought upon herself). Why not try and figure out what is preventing the planetary ecosystem (flora) from absorbing excess CO2 production? And while you're at it, find out why we're seeing decreasing quantities of oceanic marine life and what would be necessary to replenish it. And then try and figure out what Solar Cycle 25 has in store for us. You might actually find yourself feeling foolish about opposing GG emissions if we find ourselves in another "mini-iceage" like the Maunder Minimum (which I personally suspect we're due for). Hawk