Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (101639)	1/24/2009 9:51:34 AM
From: Steve Lokness	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 543200

put up such a weird story- a story which is evidence of improper food handling Yikes, did I hit a nerve this morning? You were arguing against testing of food by saying if the food is treated properly there is no danger. You mentioned baking soda and cooking as I remember. Well to the best of my knowledge the homeowner is not going to put baking soda on peanut butter nor are they going to cook. Of course there was a breakdown in the preparations of the food - BUT that is what you test for. Boy. I'm really confused as to your logic here? some improper food handling in there somehow, that introduced a bacteria that comes from fecal matter. Wrong. E.coli comes from fecal matter, salmonella exist in a good share of the chickens in their body cavity. It was Salmonella that killed these people. steve