Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (101707)	1/24/2009 5:30:14 PM
From: epicure	Respond to of 543184

I'm with you on the religion question. There is zero scientific evidence for God himself (herself, itself, themselves) much less God and the creation or "design" of species. While I have no problem with discussions of what "theory" means, scientifically speaking- folks who think "religion" might be put in a science book have no business at the table. Or do we get to scientifically tear apart the "theory" of God? - I'd love to do that, but again, it belongs in philosophy class, or mythology class, not science class. I realize the religious want to be at the science table, because it's so formal and serious there, and so concrete, but too bad. When you're dealing with the invisible and unprovable and faith driven, you don't get to play junior scientist.