SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (37436)10/24/1997 6:55:00 AM
From: Kealoha  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul: spending most of my life overseas I have been an observer of American culture. Americans love to buy the best, biggest and newest. With P2 prices around $2k, the more typical American will spring for the power, name, bells and whistles for another $1,000. Or..., for another 500 over the "sub-1000" price you get a 200Pent. I think the "typical" American will be sold the bigger machine, whether it's a 200 Pent or P2 by a saleman in the store @ Xmas. However, whatever, you and I know this market is NOT the big deal it is portrayed to be.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (37436)10/24/1997 8:55:00 AM
From: Pancho Villa  Respond to of 186894
 
Paul re: >>Very simply, if the Average Joe has less needs than you, then ONE HALF the population of "Joes" would also have less demanding needs than you.

However, assuming a "normal" distribution of "Joes", the OTHER HALF of the population of "JOES" will have needs that are MORE DEMANDING than you.<<

I guess that if my needs are equal to that of the average Joe then, assuming a symmetric distribution, not necessarily a normal distribution (i.e., gaussian), we would be talking about half the poeple having more demanding needs.

In my original message I say: "Assuming the needs of the average Joe are less than mine..." (or something to that effect). You are equating my needs to that of the average Joe who probably uses a computer just for email checking, browsing and typing. A better guess may be that my needs are somewhere in the upper third in which case we would be talking about one third and not one half.

PS: The name PANCHO is spelled P-A-N-C-H-O, not Puncho. (This may be handy to know in California where there are more Panchos than around here. But again, you may be dyslexic or just want to be a pain in the neck. Who knows!)

Pancho



To: Paul Engel who wrote (37436)10/24/1997 9:36:00 AM
From: gnuman  Respond to of 186894
 
Paul, re; "Assuming the Average Joe has less computing needs then mine"
I think something that should be considered is that the upper half of the "Joe's" are in the 40 million population that have already purchased PC's. While this still represents a good "upgrade" market, it is the bottom half, (probably lower income), that represents the "sub-$1000" market. PC ASP's are coming down, but if this is an incremental market it may not be that bad.