Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LTK007 who wrote (16769)	1/27/2009 12:32:38 PM
From: Real Man	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71447

Given the recent political changes in Pakistan, I think, hunting terrorists on their soil is less of a danger now than it was a year ago. I confess I was wary of that, military operations on the territory of a country that was a military dictatorship. That is, until I learned that changed a year ago. It was certainly impossible before, as the risk of a nuclear confrontation was high, but I guess it's less of a danger to World peace now. I agree, and Obama is trying to win the beauty queen contest from those Americans who saw Bush's emerging fascist regime as strong security and anti-terrorist efforts. Still, military operations on the territory of a sovereign nuclear country, which is not exactly friendly to the United States. Dangerous indeed. "Pakistan hopes that Obama will be more patient while dealing with Pakistan," Husain Haqqani, Pakistan's ambassador to Washington, said in an interview Wednesday with Pakistan's Geo television network. "We will review all options if Obama does not adopt a positive policy towards us." He urged Obama to "hear us out." washingtonpost.com