SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (102306)1/29/2009 12:33:30 AM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542010
 
If someone yanks out the table cloth, I don't think it fair to blame the porcelain for breaking. The brass napkin rings aren't necessarily more responsible than tea tea cups. They just have a different weakness. The china may survive the fire, while the napkin rings melt or burn.

So in part it is the type of trauma that causes these differences more than "we" are better than "them". California and NY also have a disproportionate amount of the illegals and poor. Texas too. I'm sure with the changes in the price of crude, Alaska will be impacted. We didn't ask for these effects or sensitivities, we just got them. I wouldn't characterize California as spendthrift - we pulled more than our weight in good years with one of the highest per person outputs of any state. But not this year.



To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (102306)1/29/2009 6:46:36 AM
From: Paul Kern  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542010
 
Back to the question:

So, you think that people who couldn't afford to pay for their own health insurance when they employed, should be made to:

1)Pay for health insurance when they are unemployed?

or

2) Should go without health insurance.

Which?